Journal of Visualized ExperimentsPathologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
H. Mark KenneyiD, Daniel Lichau, Rémi Blanc, Lindsay SchnuriD, Richard D. BelliD, Christopher T. RitchliniD, Edward M. SchwarziD, Hani A. AwadiD, Ronald W. WoodiD
Abstract
Quantitative description of complex anatomical structures remains challenging due to the expertise necessary for manual segmentation, labor, and interobserver variability. To overcome this, automated detection of specific landmarks can be provided by digital image analysis techniques including deep learning (DL) models. To this end, we undertook supervised automated analysis of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) datasets of murine hindpaws and forepaws (30-33 bones). Advancing beyond previously published semi-automated (SA) marker-based watershed algorithms, we added structure enhancement, tensor voting, and output dilation to identify joint spaces. Segmentation was enhanced by the use of a DL joint space prediction model (3D U-Net architecture, ResNet-18 backbone) using wild-type (WT) hindpaw labels as ground truth. Prediction was then extended to hindpaws (52.4% in test group) and forepaws from WT and tumor necrosis factor transgenic (TNF-Tg) mice with inflammatory-erosive arthritis of both sexes across age. Segmentation accuracy improved dramatically using the DL methodology (WT male: SA 79.39{+/-}5.73% vs DL 98.16{+/-}1.47%, p<0.0001; WT female: SA 79.16{+/-}4.84% vs DL 99.19{+/-}1.63%, p<0.0001). Accuracy declined with increased disease severity and age in TNF-Tg mice (TNF-Tg male 93.54{+/-}4.73%, female 91.81{+/-}2.80%, p[≤]0.01). Subsequent testing in forepaws also displayed progressive reduction in accuracy with increasing arthritic severity (i.e., WT 87.29{+/-}2.07%, TNF-Tg male 72.65{+/-}11.70%, p<0.0001). Overall, this supervised automated model outperforms recent SA approaches in healthy joints to enhance investigation of complex bone anatomy. Although flexible application to novel and disease-modified datasets demonstrates deprecated performance, utilization may nonetheless catalyze structure-specific segmentation model development.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Field percentile
- top 39%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deep learning-based segmentation of high-resolution computed tomography image data outperforms commonly used automatic bone segmentation methods
D. M. Patton, E. N. Henning, … T. L. Bredbenner·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2021
- Deep leaning auto-segmentation of tomographic datasets, repeatability and biomechanical outcomes
Felix Bowers, Richard Lane, … Chrissy L. Hammond·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2025
- Ensemble learning for robust knee cartilage segmentation: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.
E. Peake, R. Chevasson, … C. Arthofer·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2020
- Automated analysis of rabbit knee calcified cartilage morphology using micro-computed tomography and deep learning segmentation
Santeri J. O. Rytky, Lingwei Huang, … Mikko Finnilä·Journal of AnatomyPeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2021
- Clinical super-resolution computed tomography of bone microstructure: application in musculoskeletal and dental imaging
Santeri J. O. Rytky, Aleksei Tiulpin, … Jaakko L. Niinimäki·Annals of Biomedical EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2024
- Deep-learning based 3D segmentation of heterogeneous lizard claw tissue from CT data
Haleema Sadia, K. M. J. Douglas, … Parvez Alam·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2026