Journal of Cardiac FailureGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Impact of Cardiomyopathy and Arrhythmia Genetic Testing on Clinical Management Decisions
Ana MoralesiD, Yi-Lee TingiD, Brianna A. Bucknor, Mohamad A. AlkhayatiD, Naomi BarkeriD, Megan N. BettsiD, C. Anwar A. ChahaliD, Jessica L. Chowns, Rebecca Eberly, Emily HiggsiD, Lily Hoffman‐AndrewsiD, Emily A. HuthiD, Daniel Philip JudgeiD, Ajit KoduriiD, Ajith Nair, ANJALI TIKU OWENSiD, Arun PadmanabhaniD, Vasanth VedanthamiD, Jessica WangiD, Julianne WojciakiD, Edward D. EspliniD, Elizabeth M. McNallyiD
Abstract
BackgroundGenetic testing for cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia (CM/ARRH) provides diagnostic information and informs screening for at-risk relatives. Clinical guidelines recommend genetic testing for these conditions; however, data on how genetic test results influence clinical management recommendations are limited. Here, we determined the frequency of cardiologist-recommended management changes for patients following CM/ARRH genetic testing. MethodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients referred for multigene panel testing between April 2016 and April 2024. Genetically-experienced cardiologists at multicenter academic clinical practices were recruited for participation to complete surveys indicating clinical decision making on patients who had genetic testing. Cases for review were randomly selected to have both positive and non-positive results. ResultsAmong 249 patients (138 positive, 111 non-positive), 136 (54.6%) received clinical management recommendations for their own or their at-risk relatives care. Of these, 75 (55.1%) received recommendations for the patients own care, most frequently additional diagnostic tests/procedures (n=33). Compared to non-positive results, patients with positive results were more likely to receive recommendations for their own management (66/138, 47.8% vs 9/111, 8.1%; P<0.00001). Patients with positive results in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy genes had 263% higher odds of recommended management changes compared to those with TTN (OR=3.63, CI:1.40-9.84, P=0.009). ConclusionsThe results from CM/ARRH genetic testing on affected patients influenced cardiologists medical decision making and management recommendations. Additional research is needed to evaluate how genetic testing for CM/ARRH impact health outcomes.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 3th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identifying barriers to genetic testing in subspecialty cardiac care
Sierra Pond, Genevie Echols, … Briana L. Sawyer·medRxiv·May 15, 2024
- Genetic, Clinical, and Sociodemographic Profile in Individuals with Diagnosis or Family History of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Insights from a Prospective Cohort
Emerson de Santana Santos, Gabriel da Costa Kuhn, … Joselina Luzia Menezes Oliveira·GenesPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2025
- Comparing Cardiac Genetic Testing Pathways: Impacts on Access, Informed Choice, and Decisional Satisfaction
Susan Christian, Talia C. Belcher, … Cathleen Huculak·Circulation Genomic and Precision MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2026
- Genetic Counseling Educational Videos Significantly Improve Access to Genetic Testing and Counseling for Inpatients with Cardiovascular Disease
Emily E. Brown, Bryana J. Rivers, … Brittney A. Murray·medRxiv·Jun 29, 2026
- An Evidence-based Assessment of Genes in Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Elizabeth Jordan, Laiken Peterson, … Ray E. Hershberger·CirculationPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2021
- Evaluating a communication aid for return of genetic results in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A randomized controlled trial
Charlotte Burns, Laura Yeates, … Jodie Ingles·Journal of Genetic CounselingPeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2022