Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience (CCN)NeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Investigating Invariances in Auditory Event Categorization with Model Metamers
Hee So KimiD, Elizabeth J. Lee, Malinda J. McPhersoniD, Abigail L. NoyceiD, Jenelle FeatheriD
Abstract
Real-world acoustic inputs contain rich sensory information that we parse into discrete auditory objects and categories. Although deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly used to model auditory perception, the field lacks rigorous behavioral benchmarks, particularly for auditory event categorization. Here, we developed a 25-way categorization paradigm for broad classes of natural sounds to test whether categorical invariances of DNNs align with those of human observers. We first confirmed that humans could reliably categorize the natural sounds, demonstrating that our paradigm is well-suited for testing invariances in auditory categories. To probe model invariances, we evaluated human recognition of model metamers (synthetic stimuli matched to the models internal activations for each natural stimulus) for a wide range of architectures trained on speech or auditory event recognition. Evaluating widely-used public models, we found that human recognition of auditory event model metamers was generally influenced by the training task and data distribution; speech models trained on standard, curated datasets produced less recognizable metamers than auditory event recognition models. We additionally analyzed a controlled set of models to directly investigate the influence of training task and adversarial training, revealing that improved metamer recognition induced by adversarial training is task-dependent. However, even in the best-performing models, we observed a sharp decline in human recognition at the final classification layer compared to the penultimate representation layer. Overall, our results suggest that while invariances in modern architectures better align with human observers for auditory event categorization, there is still a large discrepancy between the categorical invariances of auditory neural networks and the invariances of human observers. Code and models are available at https://github.com/Feather-Lab/env-sound-metamers
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 33th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Model metamers illuminate divergences between biological and artificial neural networks
Jenelle Feather, Guillaume Leclerc, … Josh H. McDermott·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Bridging Auditory Perception and Natural Language Processing with Semantically informed Deep Neural Networks
Michele Esposito, Giancarlo Valente, … Elia Formisano·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2024
- From sound to source: Human and model recognition of environmental sounds
Sagarika Alavilli, Josh H. McDermott·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2026
- Many but not all deep neural network audio models capture brain responses and exhibit correspondence between model stages and brain regions
Greta Tuckute, Jenelle Feather, … Josh H. McDermott·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2023
- Adaptive mechanisms facilitate robust performance in noise and in reverberation in an auditory categorization model
Satyabrata Parida, Shi Tong Liu, Srivatsun Sadagopan·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 2, 2023
- Neural prediction decorrelation reveals that adversarial robustness substantially improves DNN prediction accuracy across the entire human auditory cortex
David Skrill, Jenelle Feather, Sam Norman-Haignere·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2026