Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt
Leon C. ReteigiD, Lionel A. NewmaniD, K. Richard RidderinkhofiD, Heleen A. SlagteriD
Abstract
The attentional blink (AB) phenomenon reveals a bottleneck of human information processing: the second of two targets is often missed when they are presented in rapid succession among distractors. In our previous work, we showed that the size of the AB can be changed by applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) (London & Slagter, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 756-68, 2021). Although AB size at the group level remained unchanged, the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS were negatively correlated: if a given individuals AB size decreased from baseline during anodal tDCS, their AB size would increase during cathodal tDCS, and vice versa. Here, we attempted to replicate this finding. We found no group effects of tDCS, as in the original study, but we no longer found a significant negative correlation. We present a series of statistical measures of replication success, all of which confirm that both studies are not in agreement. First, the correlation here is significantly smaller than a conservative estimate of the original correlation. Second, the difference between the correlations is greater than expected due to sampling error, and our data are more consistent with a zero-effect than with the original estimate. Finally, the overall effect when combining both studies is small and not significant. Our findings thus indicate that the effects of lDPLFC-tDCS on the AB are less substantial than observed in our initial study. Although this should be quite a common scenario, null findings can be difficult to interpret and are still under-represented in the brain stimulation and cognitive neuroscience literatures. An important auxiliary goal of this paper is therefore to provide a tutorial for other researchers, to maximize the evidential value from null findings.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Field percentile
- top 42%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation reduces collinear lateral inhibition in normal peripheral vision
Rajkumar Nallour Raveendran, Katelyn Tsang, … Benjamin S. Thompson·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2020
- Is cathodal prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation capable of affecting inhibitory control and sustained attention? A single-blind, crossover,sham-controlled study
Soraya Lage de Sá Canabarro, Cássia Karolina Paniago, … Maria Clotilde Henriques Tavares·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2020
- Dopamine alters the effect of brain stimulation on decision-making
Li‐Ann Leow, Anjeli Marcos, … Hannah L. Filmer·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2023
- How Reliable are Prefrontal tDCS Effects - Zero-effects on the Keep-track Task?
Dunja Paunović, Danka Purić, … Saša R. Filipović·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2019
- The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on behavioral and brain activity indices of visuospatial attention in intrinsic reward contexts
Atakan M. Akıl, Renáta Cserjési, … H. N. Alexander Logemann·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2023
- Examining the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on human episodic memory with machine learning
Aleksandra V. Petrovskaya, Bogdan Kirillov, … Angela Medvedeva·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2020