Procrustean pseudo-landmark methods in Python to measure massive quantities of leaf shape data
Asia T. HightoweriD, Svea Hall, Ricardo Andres Urquidi CamachoiD, Alexandra PapamichailiD, Evan Adamski, Claudia Colligan, Aidan Deneen, Georgia Dunn, Justine Haziza, Claire Henley, Arnan Pawawongsak, Lachlann Simms, Sean Ward, Manica BalantiD, Christopher B. BlackwoodiD, Charles H. CannoniD, Andrea L. CaseiD, Aman Y. HusbandsiD, Emily B. JosephsiD, Zoë MigicovskyiD, Rachel Naegele, Eric Patterson, Yenny Alejandra Saavedra-RojasiD, Daniel H. ChitwoodiD
Abstract
PremiseWhen examining leaf shapes that are different from one another, it can be difficult to compare both the overall leaf shape and points along the leaf margin in biologically and statistically meaningful ways. MethodTo address this problem, we present a simple and user-friendly leaf shape analysis in Jupyter Notebook and Python that uses pseudo-landmarks and Generalized Procrustes Analysis to measure and compare the shape of any leaf. To demonstrate our analysis, we created a repository of real leaves gathered from eight experimental datasets. ResultsUsing our leaf repository, we explain how we can use pseudo-landmarks to compare all leaf shapes both within and between species using dimension reduction techniques like Principal Component Analysis and can predict leaf shapes using pseudo-landmarks through Linear Discriminant Analysis. Our leaf shape analysis also maps differences in shape as leaves grew around a rosette, showing the transition of shape across development (phyllotaxy). Finally, we showed how we can investigate the relationship between leaf shape variation and genetic diversity by combining shape with genetic data. DiscussionThrough the use of Generalized Procrustes Analysis and pseudo-landmarks, our leaf shape analysis presents a powerful tool for examining the shape of any leaf across multiple biological, ecological, evolutionary, and developmental scales.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Persistent homology demarcates a leaf morphospace
M. Li, H. An, … D. H. Chitwood·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2017
- Botanical Digitization: Application of MorphoLeaf in 2D Shape Visualization, Digital Morphometrics, and Species Delimitation, using Homologous Landmarks of Cucurbitaceae Leaves as a Model.
O. A. Oso, A. A. Jayeola·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2020
- Geometric and Topological Approaches to Shape Variation in Ginkgo Leaves
- Morphometric analysis of Passiflora leaves: the relationship between landmarks of the vasculature and elliptical Fourier descriptors of the blade
D. H. Chitwood, W. C. Otoni·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2016
- Latent developmental and evolutionary shapes embedded within the grapevine leaf
Daniel H Chitwood, Laura L Klein, … Jason P Londo·New PhytologistPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2016
- Divergent leaf shapes among Passiflora species arise from a shared juvenile morphology
D. H. Chitwood, W. C. Otoni·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2016