bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Hemodynamic-Structural Multi-Fidelity Assessment of Endovascular Flow Diversion Strategies for Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment: An Integrated Computational and Experimental Framework
Dipu RoyiD, Farah Sadia Antara, Shama Abdullah Moshrur, Maruf Hasan, Kaiissar MannooriD, Muhammad Shattique, Jafrin SultanaiD
Abstract
Subarachnoid hemorrhage after cerebral aneurysm rupture has a 50% first-month fatality rate. Endovascular flow diversion is the primary treatment modality. However, no prior study has compared stents, coils, and the Woven Endo-Bridge hemodynamically integrating hemodynamic results with structural device behavior in one framework. An aneurysm model was reconstructed from computed tomography imaging of a patient, and computational fluid dynamics evaluated multiple hemodynamic metrics across three flow-diversion strategies. Finite element analysis assessed stent geometries with 50%, 55%, and 60% porosity in 316L stainless steel, poly-L-lactic acid, and nitinol. Universal testing machine tests validated the models with printed polylactic acid and thermoplastic polyurethane analogues. Dimensional and elastic-tube analyses tested scale equivalence between the FEA and UTM geometries and the rigid-wall CFD assumption. Patient-specific CFD confirmed a high-risk hemodynamic profile. The stent yielded the lowest peak intra-sac velocity, greatest pressure reduction, near-zero wall shear stress, the only reduction in time-averaged wall shear stress, cycle-averaged TAWSS, and the largest peak-systolic reductions in velocity, WSS, and vorticity. OSI and RRT rose for all three treated configurations, consistent with the hemodynamic signature of flow diversion. FEA reproduced the expected stiffness hierarchy (Steel > Nitinol > PLLA), and TPU was the closest surrogate for Nitinol's elastic recovery. Scaled specimens matched native-scale stiffness within 2.3%. Predicted radial distension was orders of magnitude below native wall values, supporting rigid-wall CFD. Stent-assisted diversion demonstrated the most favorable hemodynamic profile. A 50%-porosity Nitinol stent best matched target elastic mechanics, while 316L stainless steel provided the greatest resistance to radial compression.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Gelatin coating enhances flow diverting stent endothelial cell coverage, parent vessel healing and aneurysm occlusion
John W. Thompson, Jennifer Suon, … Robert M. Starke·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2026
- Computational Fluid Dynamics in Highly Complex Geometries Using MPI-Parallel Lattice Boltzmann Methods: A Biomedical Engineering Application
Reza Bozorgpour·bioRxiv·May 25, 2025
- Computational and Experimental Evaluation of a Flow-Conditioning Anastomotic Device for Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation
Keith Louis Saum, Begoña Campos, … Prabir Roy-Chaudhury·BioengineeringPeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2026
- Computational analysis to assess hemodynamic forces in descending thoracic aortic aneurysms
Francesca Duca, Daniele Bissacco, … Christian Vergara·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2025
- Evidence of tornadic phenomena in cerebral aneurysms
Valentina Mazzi, Diego Gallo, … Umberto Morbiducci·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2026
- Comparing the Effect of Helical-centerline Stent Placement on Blood Flow Velocity with a Straight Stent