Social hierarchy assays measure independent features of competitive ability

Abstract

Social hierarchies are a nearly universal feature of animal groups, but whether dominance reflects a single generalized trait or a collection of context-specific competitive abilities remains unclear. Here, we assess social hierarchy in three strains of laboratory mice (BALB/c, C57BL/6, and Shank3B knockouts) of both sexes using three established paradigms: the tube test, the warm spot assay, and the void spot assay. Hierarchies emerged in all strains and both sexes across all three assays, but how animals established rank differed markedly by strain and sex. In the tube test, Shank3b-/- knockout females, but not males, lacked the winner effects seen in wild-type mice, indicating that the ability to build a winning streak depends on social recognition in a sex-specific manner. In the warm spot assay, females formed stronger hierarchies than males, particularly among mice on a C57BL/6 background, with high-ranking females actively displacing others from the warm platform. In the void spot assay, BALB/c mice of both sexes frequently displayed territory-marking behavior, a pattern that was less common in the other strains. Overall, individual rank rarely generalized across domains, despite high trial-to-trial repeatability for individuals within each assay. Together, these findings indicate that mice behave as dominance specialists rather than generalists, with strain- and sex-specific strategies for establishing rank in different competitive contexts, suggesting that distinct neural circuits likely underlie these separable components of competitive ability.