bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Individuals lack the capacity to accurately detect emotional piloerection
J. McPhetres, A. Han, H. H. Gao, N. Kemp, B. Khati, C. X. Pu, A. Smith, X. Shui
Abstract
Piloerection (e.g., goosebumps) is an essential thermoregulatory and social signalling mechanism in non-human animals. While humans also experience piloerection--often being perceived as an indicator of profound emotional experiences--its comparatively less effective role in thermoregulation and communication might influence our capacity to monitor its occurrence. We present three studies (total N = 617) demonstrating participants general inability to detect their own piloerection events and their lack of awareness that piloerection occurs with a similar frequency on multiple anatomical locations. Participants over-reported piloerection events with only 31.8% coinciding with observable piloerection, a bias unrelated to piloerection intensity, anatomical location, heart rate variability, or interoceptive awareness. We also discovered a self-report bias for the forearm, contradicting the observation that piloerection occurs with equal frequency on multiple anatomical locations. Finally, there was low correspondence between self-reports of being "emotionally moved" and observed piloerection. These counterintuitive findings not only highlight a disconnect between an obvious physiological response and our capacity for self-monitoring, but they underscore a fascinating divergence between human and non-human species. While piloerection is vital in non-human organisms, the connection between piloerection and psychological experience in humans may be less significant than previously assumed, possibly due to its diminished evolutionary relevance. Statement of ImpactThis research reveals a striking dissociation between an obvious physiological response-- piloerection--and human capacity for self-perception. While this highlights the limitations of relying on self-report measures, it also underscores an important divergence between humans and non-human species. We propose that the relation between piloerection and psychological experience in humans is less pronounced than in other species, potentially due to its diminished role in human evolution.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Diverse stimuli induce piloerection and yield varied autonomic responses in humans
J. McPhetres·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2023
- Gradual relation between perceptual awareness, recognition and pupillary responses to social threat
Marta Poyo Solanas, Minye Zhan, Béatrice de Gelder·Current Research in Behavioral SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Awareness is determined by emotion and gender
Ema Jugović, Marta Poyo Solanas, Béatrice de Gelder·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2024
- Pre-conscious reactions to faces as the biological roots of emotion perception
Cecilia Dapor, Ronen Hershman, … Irene Sperandio·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2025
- Affective flexibility without perceptual awareness
Philipp Homan, H. Lee Lau, … Daniela Schiller·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2018
- Pupillometry as a reliable metric of auditory detection and discrimination across diverse stimulus paradigms in animal models
P. Montes-Lourido, M. Kar, … S. Sadagopan·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2020