bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
A Guide for Quantifying and Optimizing Measurement Reliability for the Study of Individual Differences
Ting XuiD, Jae Wook ChoiD, Gregory KiariD, Eric BridgefordiD, Joshua T VogelsteiniD, Michael Peter MilhamiD
Abstract
Characterizing individual variations is central to interpreting individual differences in neuroscience and clinical studies. While the field has examined multifaceted individual differences in brain functional organization, it is only in recent years that neuroimaging researchers have begun to place a priority on its quantification and optimization. Here, we highlight a potential analytic pitfall that can lead to contaminated estimates of inter-individual differences. We define a two-dimensional individual variation field map to decipher sources of individual variation and their relation to fingerprinting and measures of reliability. We illustrate theoretical gradient flow that represents the most effective direction for optimization when measuring individual differences. We propose to use this general framework for dissecting within- and between-individual variation and provide a supporting online tool for the purposes of guiding optimization efforts in biomarker discovery.
- Citations
- 6
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Suboptimal phenotypic reliability impedes reproducible human neuroscience
Aki Nikolaidis, Andrew A. Chen, … Haochang Shou·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2022
- Addressing the reliability fallacy: Similar group effects may arise from unreliable individual effects
Juliane Hilde Fröhner, Vanessa Teckentrup, … Nils B. Kroemer·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2019
- Optimizing network neuroscience computation of individual differences in human spontaneous brain activity for test-retest reliability
Chao Jiang, Ye He, … Xi‐Nian Zuo·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Putting cognitive tasks on trial: A measure of reliability convergence
Jan Kadlec, Catherine R. Walsh, … Michal Ramot·Communications PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 4, 2024
- What is the test-retest reliability of common task-fMRI measures? Newempirical evidence and a meta-analysis
Maxwell L. Elliott, Annchen R. Knodt, … Ahmad R. Hariri·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2020
- Trial and error: a hierarchical modeling approach to test-retest assessment
Gang Chen, Daniel S. Pine, … Simone P. Haller·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2021