sigLASSO: optimizing cancer mutation signatures jointly with sampling likelihood
Abstract
Multiple mutational processes drive carcinogenesis, leaving characteristic signatures on tumor genomes. Determining the active signatures from the full repertoire of potential ones can help elucidate mechanisms underlying cancer initiation and development. This task in-volves decomposing the counts of cancer mutations, tabulated according to their trinucleotide context, into a linear combination of known mutational signatures. We formulate it as an optimization problem and develop sigLASSO, a software tool, to carry it out efficiently. (An R package implementation is available at github.com/gersteinlab/siglasso). sigLASSO features four key aspects: (1) It jointly optimizes the likelihood of sampling and signature fitting, by explicitly adding multinomial sampling into the overall objective function. This is particularly important when mutation counts are low and sampling variance is high, such as in exome sequencing. (2) sigLASSO uses L1 regularization to parsimoniously assign signatures to mutation profiles, leading to sparse and more biologically interpretable solutions resembling previously well-characterized results. (3) sigLASSO fine-tunes model complexity, informed by the scale of the data and biological-knowledge based priors. In particular, instead of hard thresholding and choosing a priori a discrete subset of active signatures, sigLASSO allows continuous priors, which can be effectively learned from auxiliary information. (4) Because of this, sigLASSO can assess model uncertainty and abstain from making certain assignments in low-confidence contexts. Finally, to evaluate sigLASSO signature assignments in comparison to other approaches, we develop a set of reasonable expectations (e.g. sparsity, the ability to abstain, and robustness to noise) that we apply consistently in a variety of contexts.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 40
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignment
Marcos Díaz‐Gay, Raviteja Vangara, … Ludmil B. Alexandrov·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2023
- A simple model-based approach to inferring and visualizing cancer mutation signatures
Yuichi Shiraishi, Georg Tremmel, … Matthew Stephens·PLOS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2015
- StarSignDNA: Signature tracing for accurate representation of mutational processes
Christian Domilongo Bope, Sumana Kalyanasundaram, … Eivind J. Hovig·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2024
- MutSignatures: An R Package for Extraction and Analysis of Cancer Mutational Signatures
Damiano Fantini, Vania Vidimar, … Joshua J. Meeks·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2020
- De Novo Mutational Signature Discovery in Tumor Genomes using SparseSignatures
Avantika Lal, Keli Liu, … Daniele Ramazzotti·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2021
- SUITOR: selecting the number of mutational signatures through cross-validation
Donghyuk Lee, Difei Wang, … Bin Zhu·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2022