Does more data solve the problem of deep support? A phylogenomic approach to clarifying evolutionary relationships in the Lecanoraceae
L.J. Li, Cristóbal IvanovichiD, Scott A. LaGrecaiD, Lucía MuggiaiD, Leena MyllysiD, Sergio A. Pérez-OrtegaiD, Göran ThoriD, Lilith WeberiD, Eeva VakkariiD, Christian PrintzeniD, Julia Gerasimova
Abstract
The family Lecanoraceae is one of the most diverse groups within Lecanoromycetes, yet its internal relationships have remained unresolved despite previous multilocus studies. Here we present the first phylogenomic reconstruction of the family, based on 1003 nuclear orthologous genes from 65 genome assemblies representing the major species groups and genera. Phylogenetic trees inferred from coalescent-based analyses, together with Quartet Sampling (QS) evaluation, confirm the monophyly of Lecanoraceae and recover several well-supported lineages. The Lecanora subfusca group is resolved as polyphyletic, comprising three major clades together with Zeora and Vainionora. Additional strongly supported lineages correspond to Glaucomaria s. lat., the MPRPS clade, and Lecidella s. lat., while Bryonora and Frutidella represent early-diverging members of the family. The L. fuscescens group and Miriquidica form a distinct lineage sister to Lecanoraceae, whereas Ramboldia (Ramboldiaceae) constitutes another sister family. Backbone support was generally improved, and QS analyses showed counter-support for only a few deep nodes, indicating a complex evolutionary history likely shaped by incomplete lineage sorting, hybridization, or rapid radiation. Our results demonstrate that genome-scale data improve the resolution of Lecanoraceae, but increasing the number of genes alone can not fully resolve the backbone relationships of the family.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution
M. A. Serna Sanchez, O. A. Perez-Escobar, … T. Arias·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2020
- A genome-scale phylogeny of Fungi; insights into early evolution, radiations, and the relationship between taxonomy and phylogeny
Y. Li, J. L. Steenwyk, … A. Rokas·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2020
- Reconstructing the backbone of the Saccharomycotina yeast phylogeny using genome-scale data
Xing-Xing Shen, Xiaofan Zhou, … Antonis Rokas·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2016
- Anchored Phylogenomics of Angiosperms I: Assessing the Robustness of Phylogenetic Estimates
Chris Buddenhagen, Alan R. Lemmon, … Austin Mast·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2016
- Panic at the Discordance: the Asparagaceae Phylogenetic Backbone
Philip C. Bentz, Ethan A. Baldwin, … Cody Coyotee Howard·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2026
- Phylogenomics of the major tropical plant family Annonaceae using targeted enrichment of nuclear genes
T. L. P. Couvreur, A. J. Helmstetter, … R. H. J. Erkens·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2018