bioRxivBiophysics
The role of wingbeat frequency and amplitude in flight power
K. Krishnan, B. Garde, A. Bennison, N. C. Cole, E.-L. Cole, J. Darby, K. H. Elliott, A. Fell, A. Gómez-Laich, S. d. Grissac, M. Jessopp, E. Lempidakis, Y. Mizutani, A. Prudor, M. Quetting, F. Quintana, H. Robotka, A. Roulin, P. G. Ryan, K. Schalcher, S. Schoombie, V. Tatayah, F. Tremblay, H. Weimerskirch, S. Whelan, , E. L. C. Shepard
Abstract
Body-mounted accelerometers provide a new prospect for estimating power use in flying birds, as the signal varies with the two major kinematic determinants of aerodynamic power: wingbeat frequency and amplitude. Yet wingbeat frequency is sometimes used as a proxy for power output in isolation. There is therefore a need to understand which kinematic parameter birds vary and whether this is predicted by flight mode (e.g., accelerating, ascending/descending flight), speed or morphology. We investigate this using high-frequency acceleration data from (i) 14 species flying in the wild, (ii) two species flying in controlled conditions in a wind tunnel and (iii) a review of experimental and field studies. While wingbeat frequency and amplitude were positively correlated, R2 values were generally low, supporting the idea that parameters can vary independently. Indeed, birds were more likely to modulate wingbeat amplitude for more energy-demanding flight modes, including climbing and take-off. Nonetheless, the striking variability even within species and flight types, highlights the complexity of describing the kinematic relationships, which appear sensitive to both the biological and physical context. Notwithstanding this acceleration metrics that incorporate both kinematic parameters should be more robust proxies for power than wingbeat frequency alone.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Small deviations in kinematics and body form dictate muscle performances in the finely tuned avian downstroke
M. E. Deetjen, D. D. Chin, … D. Lentink·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2023
- Predicting Trends in Avian Wing Motion and Energetics Across Scales
Ben Parslew·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2025
- Body oscillations reduce the aerodynamic power requirement of wild silkmoth flight
Usama Bin Sikandar, Brett R. Aiello, Simon Sponberg·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2025
- Moth resonant mechanics are tuned to wingbeat frequency and energetic demands.
E. Wold, B. Aiello, … S. Sponberg·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2024
- Hawkmoths use wingstroke-to-wingstroke frequency modulation for aerial recovery to vortex ring perturbations
J. Gau, R. Gemilere, … S. Sponberg·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2020
- Using wingbeat frequency to estimate mass gained by seabirds
Allison G. L. Patterson, Marie Auger‐Méthé, Kyle H. Elliott·bioRxiv·May 15, 2025