Comparative assessment of co-folding methods for molecular glue ternary structure prediction
Yiyan LiaoiD, Jintao ZhuiD, Juan XieiD, Luhua LaiiD, Jianfeng PeiiD
Abstract
Molecular glues (MGs) represent an emerging therapeutic paradigm capable of inducing or stabilizing protein-protein interactions, with broad applications in creating neomorphic interactomes and targeted protein degradation. However, current discovery efforts remain largely confined to experimental screening, while in silico rational design of MGs persists as a formidable challenge. A critical step toward rational design lies in accurate ternary complex modeling. Given the scarcity of such complexes in the Protein Data Bank for training specialized predictive models, we tested the ability of recently developed co-folding models, including AlphaFold 3, Boltz-1, Chai-1, Protenix, and RoseTTAFold All-Atom in building the complex models. We systematically curated a dataset, named MG-PDB, with 221 non-covalent MG-engaged ternary complexes. MGBench were further introduced as a comprehensive benchmark set, which comprises 88 ternary structures excluded from co-folding models training data through rigorous time-based partitioning. Our benchmark results demonstrated that AlphaFold3 achieved the best overall performance among co-folding methods, in terms of both protein-protein interaction interface prediction (50.6% success rate) and MG-protein interaction recovery (32.9% success rate). However, our homology study showed that most of their successful predictions actually stemmed from memorization. Further analysis revealed three phenomena of current co-folding methods for MG ternary structure prediction. Firstly, these methods struggle to accurately model large interaction interfaces. Secondly, their predictive accuracy is notably reduced for domain-domain complexes compared to domain-motif interactions. Lastly, they face specific challenges in modeling MG degrader complexes with sufficient accuracy. We showcased they relied on the existing interaction patterns, and highlighted the need for further improved in novel E3 ligase systems. These findings reveal fundamental gaps in existing methods to learn atomic-level interaction rules for MG-engaged ternary complex modeling. MG-PDB and MGBench provide critical resources and mechanistic insights to advance computational MG discovery. Table of Contents Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=127 SRC="FIGDIR/small/655997v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@172b19borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ea4844org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12ea246org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9fb4bc_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- YDS-GlueFold: Surpassing AlphaFold 3-Type Models for Molecular Glue-Induced Ternary Complex Prediction
Xing Che, The Statistical Mechanics Inference Team·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2024
- FKSFold: Improving AlphaFold3-Type Predictions of Molecular Glue-Induced Ternary Complexes with Feynman-Kac-Steered Diffusion
Jian Shen, Shengmin Zhou, Xing Che·bioRxiv·May 3, 2025
- gapTrick - Structural characterisation of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold
Grzegorz Chojnowski·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025
- Comparative Assessment of the Utility of Co-Folding and Docking for Small-Molecule Drug Design
Ute F. Röhrig, Marine Bugnon, Vincent Zoete·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2026
- Large scale prospective evaluation of co-folding across hundreds of Mac1-ligand complexes and three virtual screens
Jongbin Kim, G.J. Correy, … James S. Fraser·eLifePeer-reviewed·Oct 12, 2026
- Have protein-ligand co-folding methods moved beyond memorisation?
Peter Škrinjar, Jérôme Eberhardt, … Janani Durairaj·Nature Structural & Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2026