Urban ecological connectivity as a planning tool for different animal species.
H. Kirk, K. Soanes, M. Amati, S. Bekessy, L. Harrison, K. Parris, C. Ramalho, R. van der Ree, C. Threlfall
Abstract
The application of ecological theory to urban planning is becoming more important as land managers focus on increasing urban biodiversity as a way to improve human welfare. City authorities must decide not only what types of biodiversity-focused infrastructure should be prioritized, but also where new resources should be positioned and existing resources protected or enhanced. Careful spatial planning can contribute to the successful return and conservation of urban nature by maximizing the contribution of green infrastructure to landscape connectivity. By using ecological connectivity theory as a planning tool, governments can quantify the effect of different interventions on the ease with which wildlife can move across the landscape. Here we outline an approach to a) quantify ecological connectivity for different urban wildlife species and b) use this to test different urban planning scenarios using QGIS. We demonstrate four extensions to the work by Deslaurier et al. (2018) and Spanowicz & Jaeger (2019) which improve the application of this method as a planning tool for local government: O_LIA step-by-step method for calculating effective mesh size using the open-source software QGIS. C_LIO_LIConversion of the effective mesh size value (meff) to a "probability of connectedness" (Pc, for easier interpretation by local government and comparisons between planning scenarios). C_LIO_LIGuidance for measuring species-specific connectivity, including how to decide what spatial information should be included and which types of species might be most responsive to connectivity planning. C_LIO_LIAdvice for using the method to measure the outcome of different urban planning scenarios on ecological connectivity. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Operationalizing ecological connectivity in spatial conservation planning with Marxan Connect
R. M. Daigle, A. Metaxas, … M. Beger·bioRxiv·May 7, 2018
- From expert opinion to empirical evidence: Data-driven parametrization of urban connectivity models using movement-proxy data
Lisa Merkens, Soyeon Bae, … Anne Mimet·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2023
- Landscape matters: Deriving a generalizable understanding of population connectivity using empirical data and graph theory
Divyashree Rana, Samuel A. Cushman, Uma Ramakrishnan·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2025
- Using sentinel nodes to evaluate changing connectivity in a protected areas network
P. O'Brien, N. Carr, J. Bowman·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2023
- Areas Important for Ecological Connectivity Throughout Canada
R. Pither, P. O'Brien, … J. Bowman·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2021
- Rapid evaluation of habitat connectivity change to safeguard multispecies persistence in human-transformed landscapes
J. Oehri, S. L. R. Wood, … A. Gonzalez·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2023