BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Bridging Ancestry Gaps in Genomic Risk Prediction with Tabular Foundation Models
Abstract
MotivationModels deployed for genomic prediction of diseases perform unevenly across populations, limiting clinical utility. Two factors drive this limitation: large imbalances in sample availability across ancestry groups and non-stationarity of genotype-phenotype effect sizes across the ancestry continuum. While tabular foundation models with in-context learning (ICL) have shown strong sample efficiency in other domains, their effectiveness for genotype-to-phenotype prediction and their robustness to ancestry-driven effect heterogeneity remain unclear. ResultsUsing large, ancestrally diverse biobank data, we show that ICL-capable tabular foundation models reduce performance degradation in under-sampled ancestry groups compared to conventional supervised approaches. However, we find that prevailing models trained on existing synthetic tabular tasks fail when allele effect sizes vary across ancestry space. Treating genetic ancestry as a continuous variable, we introduce an instruction-tuning framework that exposes models to synthetic tasks with ancestry-dependent non-stationary effects. Instruction-tuned models achieve improved and more stable predictive performance across the genetic ancestry continuum, including for individuals distant from in-context exemplars in ancestry space. Availability and ImplementationAll code for instruction-tuning models, synthetic task generation, data wrangling, and model evaluation, is publicly available at https://github.com/ai4pm/Bridging-Ancestry-Gaps-in-Genomic-Risk-Prediction-with-Tabular-Foundation-Models. The final instruction-tuned model (ICL-NS-G2P-proto) is also released in this repository. Detailed documentation is provided, including environment setup instructions and guidelines for running various parts. The instruction-tuning task datasets are available at https://zenodo.org/records/18309187. Contactadas23@uthsc.edu, ycui2@uthsc.edu Supplementary InformationSupplementary data are available online.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Where Tabular Foundation Models Falter on Genetic Data: Datasets That Expose and Provide a Path to Address the Gap
Anirban Das, Yan Cui·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2026
- A Transparent and Generalizable Deep Learning Framework for Genomic Ancestry Prediction
Camille Rochefort-Boulanger, Matthew Scicluna, … Julie Hussin·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2026
- Explicit modeling of ancestry improves polygenic risk scores and BLUP prediction
Chia-Yen Chen, Jiali Han, … Alkes L. Price·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2015
- SPLENDID incorporates continuous genetic ancestry in biobank-scale data to improve polygenic risk prediction across diverse populations
Tony Chen, Haoyu Zhang, … Xihong Lin·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2026
- Deep transfer learning provides a Pareto improvement for multi-ancestral clinico-genomic prediction of diseases
- Using Genomic Context Informed Genotype Data and Within-model Ancestry Adjustment to Classify Type 2 Diabetes
Eric J. Barnett, Yanli Zhang‐James, … Stephen V. Faraone·Communications MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2025