Quantifying Differences and Similarities in Whole-brain White Matter Architecture Using Local Connectome Fingerprints
Fang-Cheng Yeh, Jean Vettel, Aarti Singh, Barnabas Poczos, Scott Grafton, Kirk Erickson, Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng, Timothy VerstyneniD
Abstract
Quantifying differences or similarities in connectomes has been a challenge due to the immense complexity of global brain networks. Here we introduce a noninvasive method that uses diffusion MRI to characterize whole-brain white matter architecture as a single local connectome fingerprint that allows for a direct comparison between structural connectomes. In four independently acquired data sets with repeated scans (total N=213), we show that the local connectome fingerprint is highly specific to an individual, allowing for an accurate self-versus-others classification that achieved 100% accuracy across 17,398 identification tests. The estimated classification error was approximately one thousand times smaller than fingerprints derived from diffusivity-based measures or region-to-region connectivity patterns. The local connectome fingerprint also revealed neuroplasticity within an individual reflected as a decreasing trend in self-similarity across time, whereas this change was not observed in the diffusivity measures. Moreover, the local connectome fingerprint can be used as a phenotypic marker, revealing 12.51% similarity between monozygotic twins, 5.14% between dizygotic twins, and 4.51% between none-twin siblings. This novel approach opens a new door for probing the influence of pathological, genetic, social, or environmental factors on the unique configuration of the human connectome.\n\nAuthor SummaryThe local organization of white matter architecture is highly unique to individuals, making it a tangible metric of connectomic differences. The variability in local white matter architecture is found to be partially determined by genetic factors, but largely plastic across time. This approach opens a new door for probing the influence of pathological, genetic, social, or environmental factors on the unique configuration of the human connectome.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Local Connectome Phenotypes Predict Social, Health, and Cognitive Factors
Michael A. Powell, Javier O. Garcia, … Timothy Verstynen·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2017
- Individual uniqueness of connectivity gradients is driven by the complexity of the embedded networks and their dispersion
Yvonne Serhan, Shaymaa Darawshy, … Smadar Ovadia‐Caro·Brain Structure and FunctionPeer-reviewed·Jul 3, 2025
- Structural connectome fingerprinting and age prediction in pediatric development: assessing voxel- and surface-based white matter connectivity
Noor Al‐Sharif, Etienne St‐Onge, … Alan Charles Evans·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2021
- Fingerprinting and behavioural prediction rest on distinct functional systems of the human connectome
Maron Mantwill, Martin Gell, … Carsten Finke·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 24, 2022
- Population-Averaged Atlas of the Macroscale Human Structural Connectome and Its Network Topology
Fang-Cheng F. Yeh, Sandip S. Panesar, … Timothy Verstynen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2018
- Is the whole more than the sum of its parts? Considering global and local features of the connectome improves prediction of individuals and phenotype
Steve Riley, Annie Cheng, … Sarah W. Yip·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026