Assemblage of Focal Species Recognizers - AFSR: A technique for decreasing false positive rates of acoustic automatic identification in a multiple species context
I. B. Campos, T. J. Landers, K. D. Lee, W. G. Lee, M. R. Friesen, A. C. Gaskett, L. Ranjard
Abstract
Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) coupled with automated species identification is a promising tool for species monitoring and conservation worldwide. However, high false positive rates are still an important limitation and a crucial factor for acceptance of these techniques in wildlife surveys. Here we present the Assemblage of Focal Species Recognizers - AFSR, a novel approach for decreasing false positives and increasing models precision in multispecies contexts. AFSR focusses on decreasing false positives by excluding unreliable sound file segments that are prone to misidentification. We used MatlabHTK, a hidden Markov models interface for bioacoustics analyses, for illustrating AFSR technique by comparing two approaches, 1) a multispecies recognizer where all species are identified simultaneously, and 2) an assemblage of focal species recognizers (AFSR), where several recognizers that each prioritise a single focal species are then summarised into a single output, according to a set of rules designed to exclude unreliable segments. Both approaches (the multispecies recognizer and AFSR) used the same sound files training dataset, but different processing workflow. We applied these recognisers to PAM recordings from a remote island colony with five seabird species and compared their outputs with manual species identifications. False positive rates and precision improved for all the five species when using AFSR, achieving remarkable 0% false positives and 100% precision for three of five seabird species, and 90% precision for the other two species. AFSR output was also used to generate daily calling activity patterns for each species. Instead of attempting to withdraw useful information from every fragment in a sound recording, AFSR prioritises more trustworthy information from sections with better quality data. AFSR can be applied to automated species identification from multispecies PAM recordings worldwide.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Inadequate sampling of the soundscape leads to overoptimistic estimates of recogniser performance: a case study of two sympatric macaw species
T. C. Lewis, I. Gutierrez Vargas, … D. Childs·bioRxiv·Dec 29, 2022
- A Machine Learning Approach to the Recognition of Brazilian Atlantic Forest Parrot Species
B. Padovese, L. Padovese·bioRxiv·Dec 24, 2019
- Unsupervised source separation and clustering of soundscape recordings predicts avian richness in hyperdiverse systems
W. Alexander Hopping, Sidd Srinivasan, … Jos Barlow·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2026
- PAMalytics: a no-code application for structured validation of bioacoustic detections
Alastair Pickering, Santiago Martínez Balvanera, … Jenna Lawson·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2026
- Passive acoustic monitoring of the rare orange-bellied parrot: automated detection using BirdNET-based transfer learning
Giselle Owens, Connor M. Wood, … Dejan Stojanović·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2026
- Sound Advice: A calibration framework for defining detection space in Passive Acoustic Monitoring
Prabhat Sharma, Kunapareddy Kezia, K. Seshadri·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 27, 2026