bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
Careers in Scientific Editing: Results from the 2024 Scientific Editors Network (ScENe) Survey
Heather AldrichiD, Jennifer BarriD, Becky JamesiD, Robert M. LawrenceiD, Megan MayerleiD, Ann SuttoniD
Abstract
Funding and publishing scientific research has become increasingly competitive, highlighting a growing need for clear and accurate scientific communication. Scientific editors are professionals who help ensure that grant proposals and research manuscripts meet the standards of funding agencies and peer-reviewed journals while effectively communicating research significance to diverse audiences. However, detailed information characterizing the scientific editing profession is scarce. While some organizations have conducted salary surveys, to our knowledge, no comprehensive survey of the scientific editing field has been conducted. Here, we report findings from a 2024 comprehensive survey of 132 scientific editors. We collected data on demographics and education, career experience and current employment, skills and types of editing, and outcomes and satisfaction. Our data reveal that scientific editors have homogenous demographic characteristics but considerable variability in job titles, employment mechanisms, and career pathways. As the responsibilities of many scientific editors, including supporting proposal development, applying best practices in grantsmanship, and identifying strategies to enhance competitiveness for research funding, overlap with those of research development professionals, our findings provide considerations for further incorporating or defining the role of scientific editors within research development offices. Our results also suggest avenues for scientific editors to start or advance their careers. We anticipate that our results will serve as a foundation for discussions on the future directions of the scientific editing profession as well as areas for future research and professional development.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Gender Imbalance in the Editorial Activities of a Researcher-led Journal
T. Seidel Malkinson, D. B. Terhune, … T. R. Makin·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2021
- Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience
E. R. Palser, M. Lazerwitz, K. Fotopoulou·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2021
- Empowering future scientists: Mentors employ various strategies to engage students in professional science disciplinary literacy practices
Trisha Minocha, Tanya Bhagatwala, … Sarah C. Fankhauser·Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2025
- Intellectual contributions meriting authorship:Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories
G. S. Patience, F. Galli, … D. C. Boffito·bioRxiv·May 17, 2018
- The Mismatch Between Neuroscience Graduate Training and Professional Skill Sets
S. Shah, A. L. Juavinett·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2021
- Task specialization across research careers
N. Robinson-Garcia, R. Costas, … G. F. Nane·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2020