bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
Empowering future scientists: Mentors employ various strategies to engage students in professional science disciplinary literacy practices
T. Minocha, T. Bhagatwala, G. Mirzoyan, G. S. McDowell, S. C. Fankhauser
Abstract
Peer-review and publication are important parts of the scientific enterprise, and research has shown that engaging students in such scholarly practices helps build their sense of belonging and scientific identity. Yet, these disciplinary literacy skills and professional practices are often part of the hidden curriculum of science research, thus excluding students and others from fully understanding ways in which scientific knowledge is constructed, refined, and disseminated even though students are participating in such activities. Secondary students are increasingly involved in scientific research projects that include authentic disciplinary literacy components such as research proposals, posters, videos, and scientific research papers. More and more, students are also engaging in professional practice of publishing their scientific research papers through dedicated secondary science journals. How teachers and other mentors support the development of professional disciplinary literacies in students is critical to understand as part of supporting more student participation in research. To this end, we used a mixed- methods study of interviews and surveys to examine the experience and conceptions of the mentors (teachers and professional scientists) who guided pre-college students through the writing and publication of their scientific research projects. Analyzing our data from a lens of cognitive apprenticeship, we find that mentors encourage independence by primarily employing the method of "exploration". We also find that mentors have divergent views on the value of publication within science, versus for student scientists specifically. Our findings suggest that mentors could work to explicitly reveal their own thinking within science writing to provide more sequenced support for student scientists.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: mixed model
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A survey of the mentor-mentee relationship in early career research (ECR): Implications for publishing and career advancement in the STEMM disciplines
Ronan Lordan, Michael A. Wride, Íde O’Sullivan·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2024
- Writing for identity? Exploring the motivations of pre-college students to participate in science publication
Sarah C. Fankhauser, Tanya Bhagatwala·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2025
- The Role of Mentoring in Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEM Education and Research
A. Marshall, Z. Vue, … A. Hinton·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2021
- "Important enough to show the world": Using Authentic Research Opportunities and Micropublications to Build Students Science Identities
L. D. Rubenstein, K. A. Woodruff, … E. M. Rubenstein·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2023
- Seeing isn't believing? Mixed effects of a perspective-getting intervention to improve mentoring relationships for science doctoral students
Trevor T. Tuma, Heather Noel Fedesco, … Erin L. Dolan·CBE—Life Sciences EducationPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2025
- Insights from a survey of mentorship experiences by graduate and postdoctoral researchers
S. Sarabipour, N. M. Niemi, … K. Clark·bioRxiv·May 5, 2023