Human Brain MappingNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Can we predict real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success from pre-training brain activity?
Amelie HauggiD, Ronald SladkyiD, Stavros SkourasiD, Amalia McDonald, Cameron CraddockiD, Matthias KirschneriD, Marcus HerdeneriD, Yury KoushiD, Marina PapoutsiiD, Jackob Nimrod KeynaniD, Talma HendleriD, Kathrin Cohen KadoshiD, Catharina ZichiD, Jeff MacInnes, R. Alison AdcockiD, Kathryn C. Dickerson, Nan‐kuei CheniD, Kymberly D. YoungiD, Jerzy BodurkaiD, Shuxia YaoiD, Benjamin BeckeriD, Tibor AueriD, Renate SchweizeriD, Gustavo Santo Pedro PamplonaiD, Kirsten EmmertiD, , Frank ScharnowskiiD
Abstract
Neurofeedback training has been shown to influence behavior in healthy participants as well as to alleviate clinical symptoms in neurological, psychosomatic, and psychiatric patient populations. However, many real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies report large interindividual differences in learning success. The factors that cause this vast variability between participants remain unknown and their identification could enhance treatment success. Thus, here we employed a meta-analytic approach including data from 24 different neurofeedback studies with a total of 401 participants, including 140 patients, to determine whether levels of activity in target brain regions during pre-training functional localizer or no-feedback runs (i.e., self-regulation in the absence of neurofeedback) could predict neurofeedback learning success. We observed a slightly positive correlation between pre-training activity levels during a functional localizer run and neurofeedback learning success, but we were not able to identify common brain-based success predictors across our diverse cohort of studies. Therefore, advances need to be made in finding robust models and measures of general neurofeedback learning, and in increasing the current study database to allow for investigating further factors that might influence neurofeedback learning.
- Citations
- 48
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Field percentile
- top 32%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Putamen volume predicts real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success across paradigms and neurofeedback target regions
Zhiying Zhao, Shuxia Yao, … Benjamin Becker·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jan 5, 2021
- Determinants of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Performance and Improvement: a Machine Learning Mega-Analysis
Amelie Haugg, Fabian M. Renz, … David Steyrl·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2020
- Neural Mechanisms of Feedback Processing and Regulation Recalibration during Neurofeedback Training
Gustavo Santo Pedro Pamplona, Jana Zweerings, … Frank Scharnowski·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Long-term effects of network-based fMRI neurofeedback training for sustained attention
Gustavo Santo Pedro Pamplona, Jennifer Heldner, … Frank Scharnowski·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2021
- The role of superstition of cognitive control during neurofeedback training
Doris Grössinger, Florian Ph. S. Fischmeister, … Guilherme Maia de Oliveira Wood·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2021
- Online self-evaluation of fMRI-based neurofeedback performance
Santiago Muñoz-Moldes, Anita Tursic, … Rainer Goebel·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2024