A Primary Central Source Determines Perturbation-Evoked N1 Amplitudes but not Latencies in Younger Adults
Janna ProtzakiD, Jasmine L. MirdamadiiD, Michael Robert BorichiD, Lena H. TingiD
Abstract
The balance perturbation-evoked N1 potential is a reliable cortical response during reactive balance control that is correlated to a variety of cognitive and motor functions. Although the supplementary motor area (SMA) has been identified as the primary source of the N1, it is less understood whether other brain regions contribute to N1 recorded at the scalp. We used source localization on electroencephalography (EEG) data from 25 younger adults recorded during backward whole-body perturbations during stance. We identified the sources that contribute to channel-based N1 recordings and quantified their impact on N1 amplitude and latency. In younger adults, N1 amplitudes can be explained by one single source in a central midline cortical region covering the SMA. When reconstructing N1 signals using backprojections with one versus all independent components (IC) identified as brain sources there was no difference in peak amplitudes and a small but significant difference in N1 peak latencies. Parallel brain sources thus deflect the time course of the N1, but not its magnitude. Brain areas associated with ICs contributing to the shift in N1 latency varied between participants. Our results emphasize the dominant influence of central cortical areas on the N1 response, informing hypothesizes regarding the nature of the signal and its functional role. Importantly, the extent and location of other cortical structures that influence N1 timing, such as parietal cortex areas and the anterior cingulate cortex, may further elucidate cortical contributions to balance. These markers could be crucial for the early detection of balance problems in clinical populations. NEW & NOTEWORTHYWe demonstrate that channel-level amplitudes of the balance perturbation-evoked N1 in younger adults primarily reflect neural activity originating from cortical central midline regions, particularly the SMA. In contrast, contributions from parallel active brain regions evoked by balance perturbations are indicated by an influence on N1 peak latencies. Our findings imply that the perturbation-evoked N1, unlike other evoked potentials, is not a mixture of multiple neural sources in younger adults.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Test-retest reliability of perturbation-evoked cortical activity reflects stable individual differences in reactive balance control
Jasmine L. Mirdamadi, Alexander Poorman, … Aiden M. Payne·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2024
- Cortical response to balance perturbation is more sensitive in modern dancers than nondancers during biomechanically similar balance recovery
Kennedy Kerr, Scott E. Boebinger, … Lena H. Ting·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2026
- Cortical responses to balance perturbations persist without active postural control
Daphne Nadine Rani Jansen, Lucas Mensink, … Patrick Alan Forbes·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 23, 2026
- Distinct cortical correlates of perception and motor function in balance control
Jasmine L. Mirdamadi, Lena H. Ting, Michael Robert Borich·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2024
- The balance N1 and the ERN correlate in amplitude across individuals in small samples of younger and older adults
Aiden M. Payne, Lena H. Ting, Greg Hajcak·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2023
- The cortical N1 response to balance perturbation is associated with balance and cognitive function in different ways between older adults with and without Parkinson's disease
Aiden M. Payne, J. Lucas McKay, Lena H. Ting·Cerebral Cortex CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2022