henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint

Normative Deviations Reveal Task-Evoked and Clinical Network Reorganization

Jean‐Philippe KrölliD, Mohamed AbdelmotalebiD, Harun KocataşiD, Veronika I. MülleriD, Lya K. Paas OliverosiD, Marcus MeinzeriD, Agnes FlöeliD, Simon Bodo EickhoffiD, Kaustubh R. PatiliD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Understanding how cognitive demands and pathology reshape large-scale functional connectivity (FC) requires methods that are both multivariate and region-specific. Here we introduce One-class SVM-based Connectome Anomaly Recognition (OSCAR), a normative modelling framework that detects condition-related deviations in the multivariate connectivity profile of a brain region. OSCAR learns the distribution of region-to-whole-brain connectivity patterns given a reference state sample (e.g. resting-state data; RS) using a one-class support vector machine (OCSVM). The trained models are then applied to FC profiles from a target condition (e.g., task or patient group). The outlier proportions are used to quantify the difference between the reference and target condition. We validated OSCAR on three diverse tasks and a patient cohort with early psychosis. OSCAR consistently identified condition-sensitive regions in networks known to support conflict processing, object-location memory, lexical learning, and early psychosis, respectively, including thalamic and basal ganglia regions. Moreover, it detected additional well-established task- or disease-relevant parcels not captured by the comparison method permutation-based multivariate analysis of variance (perMANOVA). Regions flagged by OSCAR were at least as close, and often closer, to independent task-activation findings than those identified by perMANOVA. These results demonstrate that OSCAR provides an interpretable, region-centred normative modelling approach that is sensitive to subtle multivariate FC deviations, and offers a practical tool for mapping condition-specific reconfigurations of functional brain networks with high external validity, in both experimental and clinical settings.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.