Task activations produce spurious but systematic inflation of task functional connectivity estimates
Michael W. ColeiD, Takuya ItoiD, Douglas H. SchultziD, Ravi D. MilliD, Richard J. CheniD, Carrisa V. CocuzzaiD
Abstract
Most neuroscientific studies have focused on task-evoked activations (activity amplitudes at specific brain locations), providing limited insight into the functional relationships between separate brain locations. Task-state functional connectivity (FC) - statistical association between brain activity time series during task performance moves beyond task-evoked activations by quantifying functional interactions during tasks. However, many task-state FC studies do not remove the first-order effect of taskevoked activations prior to estimating task-state FC. It has been argued that this results in the ambiguous inference \"likely active or interacting during the task\", rather than the intended inference \"likely interacting during the task\". Utilizing a neural mass computational model, we verified that task-evoked activations substantially and inappropriately inflate task-state FC estimates, especially in functional MRI (fMRI) data. Various methods attempting to address this problem have been developed, yet the efficacies of these approaches have not been systematically assessed. We found that most standard approaches for fitting and removing mean task-evoked activations were unable to correct these inflated correlations. In contrast, methods that flexibly fit mean task-evoked response shapes effectively corrected the inflated correlations without reducing effects of interest. Results with empirical fMRI data confirmed the models predictions, revealing activation-induced task-state FC inflation for both Pearson correlation and psychophysiological interaction (PPI) approaches. These results demonstrate that removal of mean task-evoked activations using an approach that flexibly models task-evoked response shape is an important preprocessing step for valid estimation of task-state FC.\n\nHighlightsO_LIComputational model shows task inflation of functional connectivity estimates\nC_LIO_LIHemodynamic responses cause task activations to further inflate estimates\nC_LIO_LIStandard approaches to remove task activations leave many false positives\nC_LIO_LIMethods that flexibly fit hemodynamic response shape effectively correct inflation\nC_LIO_LICorrection of functional connectivity inflation verified with empirical fMRI data\nC_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 211
- FWCI
- 11.15
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The functional relevance of task-state functional connectivity
Michael W. Cole, Takuya Ito, … Rubén Sánchez-Romero·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2021
- Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations
Michael W Cole, Takuya Ito, … Douglas H Schultz·bioRxiv·May 24, 2016
- Task-Evoked Functional Connectivity Does Not Explain Functional Connectivity Differences Between Rest and Task Conditions
Lauren K. Lynch, Kun‐Han Lu, … Zhongming Liu·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2018
- Large-scale intrinsic connectivity is consistent across varying task demands
Paulina Kieliba, Sasidhar S. Madugula, … Tamar R. Makin·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 10, 2019
- Task-evoked activity quenches neural correlations and variability across cortical areas
Takuya Ito, Scott L. Brincat, … Michael W. Cole·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 3, 2020
- Quantifying differences between passive and task-evoked intrinsic functional connectivity in a large-scale brain simulation
Antonio Ulloa, Barry Horwitz·Brain ConnectivityPeer-reviewed·Nov 15, 2018