A rapid method to quantify small-scale vegetation patch structure to complement conventional quadrat surveys
Abstract
AimsVegetation sampling typically involves the use of quadrats, often 1m2, to estimate species cover-abundance. Such surveys do not generally record small-scale vegetation patch structure at sub-quadrat scales, for example 10 cm2. Here we test a simple method to quantify patch structure that complements conventional techniques. We compare the two methods, and analyse metrics derived from small-scale patch surveys with environment / management data. LocationNorthumberland, United Kingdom MethodsWe recorded cover-abundance of all species in an upland moor with 1m2 quadrats. These were divided into 100 sub-quadrats, 10 x 10 cm, and the dominant and subdominant species identified. Patch metrics (number, area and shape) for individual species recorded as dominant or subdominant in the sub-quadrat survey were analysed using multivariate generalised linear models with environmental and management data. Sub-quadrat data were also aggregated for each quadrat, to create species composition data. The two sets of compositional data, from whole-quadrat and sub-quadrat aggregations, were compared via Procrustes rotation of ordination scores. ResultsPatch number, area and shape for dominant and subdominant species were all significantly affected by soil pH, soil water content, slope and elevation. Effects of proximity to sheep tracks and drainage ditches were less consistent amongst species. Ordinations of vegetation data from conventional and sub-quadrats were similar, with significant Procrustes R-squared of 67% and 70% for dominant and subdominant species respectively. ConclusionsSub-quadrat surveys can easily be used to complement existing whole-quadrat surveys at little cost in time or resources. Their patch metrics can provide additional insights into the environmental and management drivers that may affect the growth of individual plants or clumps, potentially in relation to plant traits, and thus alter the overall community composition. The methods we describe can readily be adapted to other sizes of quadrats and sub-quadrats in a wide range of vegetation communities.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How comparable across management goals are grassland monitoring methods?
Hunter Messick, Elinor M. Lichtenberg·bioRxiv·May 20, 2026
- Estimating plant abundance in irregular polygons: plot-based sampling with a conditional spatial configuration
C. Damgaard·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2020
- Combining quadrat, rake and echosounding to estimate submerged aquatic vegetation biomass at the ecosystem scale
M. Botrel, C. Hudon, … R. Maranger·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2022
- The utility of visual estimation of cover for rapid assessment of graminoid abundance in forest and grassland habitats in studies of animal foraging
Hansraj Gautam, G. G. Potdar, T.N.C. Vidya·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2014
- Plants stand still but hide: imperfect and heterogeneous detection is the rule when counting plants
J. Perret, A. Besnard, … G. Papuga·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2022
- Species abundance distributions should underpin ordinal cover-abundance transformations
M. J. McNellie, J. Dorrough, I. Oliver·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2019