The utility of visual estimation of cover for rapid assessment of graminoid abundance in forest and grassland habitats in studies of animal foraging
Abstract
QuestionsTo assess the feasibility of using visually-estimated cover in rapid assessment of herbivore food species abundance in the grass layer, we asked the following questions: 1) What is the relationship between total graminoid cover and biomass in forests, and does height improve the prediction of biomass from cover? 2) How does total cover relate to biomass in a grassland habitat? 3) How does elephant food species graminoid cover relate to individual species biomass? 4) How well does species diversity of forest understorey grass layer, calculated from cover data, mirror that calculated from biomass data?\n\nLocationNagarahole National Park, India.\n\nMethodsWe estimated the abundance of graminoids through visual estimation of cover and weighted harvested biomass in forest and grassland plots. In forests, two estimates of total graminoid abundance, total graminoid cover and sum of species covers, were used. In the grassland, only total graminoid abundance was measured. We examined the relationship between cover estimates and biomass, and the additional utility of height in predicting biomass, using multiple regressions and AIC-based model selection. We also assessed similarity in cover- and biomass-based Simpsons and Shannon-Wiener diversity indices using regressions.\n\nResultsGraminoid cover explained a large portion of variation in total graminoid biomass in forest and grassland habitats. The sum of species covers was better than total cover in estimating total graminoid biomass in the forest. The benefit of including height to estimate total biomass was moderate in forests but substantial in grassland. Cover estimates were good proxies of food species biomass, and the addition of height did not yield better models for most species. Species diversity indices calculated from cover largely matched those based on biomass.\n\nConclusionsVisual estimation of species cover is a good alternative to biomass harvesting for rapid assessment of abundance of graminoids consumed by generalist herbivores, like elephants.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Overwhelming presence of non-food vegetation undermines the reliability of NDVI as a surrogate of forage abundance for a large herbivore in a tropical forest habitat
Hansraj Gautam, Evangeline Arulmalar, … TNC Vidya·bioRxiv·Jun 27, 2018
- How comparable across management goals are grassland monitoring methods?
Hunter Messick, Elinor M. Lichtenberg·bioRxiv·May 20, 2026
- Hidden grassland productivity from overlooked herbivore impacts
Yan Shi, Hao Wang, … Jin-Sheng He·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026
- An evaluation model for aboveground biomass Based on Hyperspectral Data from field and TM8 in Khorchin grassland, China
z. xiaohua, M. Tian, … D. Xing·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2019
- Consumption rate and dietary choice of cattle in species-rich mesic grasslands
N. Balogh, B. Tothmeresz, … A. Kelemen·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2020
- Deciphering landscape-scale plant cover and biodiversity from soil eDNA
Tim Goodall, Robert Iwan Griffiths, … Daniel S. Read·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025