Predicting transcriptional activation domain function using Graph Neural Networks
Farhanaz FarheeniD, Bradley K. BroylesiD, Yuanyuan ZhangiD, Nabil IbtehaziD, Alexandre M. ErkineiD, Daisuke KiharaiD
Abstract
Analysis of factors that lead to the functionality of transcriptional activation domains remains a crucial and yet challenging task owing to the significant diversity in their sequences and their intrinsically disordered nature. Almost all existing methods that have aimed to predict activation domains have involved traditional machine learning approaches, such as logistic regression, that are unable to capture complex patterns in data or plain convolutional neural networks and have been limited in exploration of structural features. However, there is a tremendous potential in the inspection of the structural properties of activation domains, and an opportunity to investigate complex relationships between features of residues in the sequence. To address these, we have utilized the power of graph neural networks which can represent structural data in the form of nodes and edges, allowing nodes to exchange information among themselves. We have experimented with two kinds of graph formulations, one involving residues as nodes and the other assigning atoms to be the nodes. A logistic regression model was also developed to analyze feature importance. For all the models, several feature combinations were experimented with. The residue-level GNN model with amino acid type, residue position, acidic/basic/aromatic property and secondary structure feature combination gave the best performing model with accuracy, F1 score and AUROC of 97.9%, 71% and 97.1% respectively which outperformed other existing methods in the literature when applied on the dataset we used. Among the other structure-based features that were analyzed, the amphipathic property of helices also proved to be an important feature for classification. Logistic regression results showed that the most dominant feature that makes a sequence functional is the frequency of different types of amino acids in the sequence. Our results consistent have shown that functional sequences have more acidic and aromatic residues whereas basic residues are seen more in non-functional sequences.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The balance of acidic and hydrophobic residues predicts acidic transcriptional activation domains from protein sequence
Sanjana R. Kotha, Max Valentín Staller·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2023
- A high-throughput screen for transcription activation domains reveals their sequence characteristics and permits reliable prediction by deep learning
Ariel Erijman, Lukasz Pawel Kozlowski, … Steven Hahn·Molecular CellPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2020
- Interpretable biophysical neural networks of transcriptional activation domains separate roles of protein abundance and coactivator binding
Claire J. LeBlanc, Pooja Agarwal, … Max Valentín Staller·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2026
- Structure-Based Function Prediction using Graph Convolutional Networks
Vladimir Gligorijević, P. Douglas Renfrew, … Richard Bonneau·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2021
- Evolutionary turnover of key amino acids explains conservation of function without conservation of sequence in transcriptional activation domains
Claire J. LeBlanc, Jordan Stefani, … Max Valentín Staller·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2026
- GraphPred: An approach to predict multiple DNA motifs from ATAC-seq data using graph neural network and coexisting probability
Shuangquan Zhang, Lili Yang, … Yan Wang·bioRxiv·May 2, 2022