Flight behaviour diverges more between seasonal forms than between species in Pieris butterflies
Irena KlečkováiD, Daniel LinkeiD, Francisko de Moraes RezendeiD, Luca Rauscher, Camille Le RoyiD, Pável F. Matos‐MaravíiD
Abstract
In flying animals, wing morphology is typically assumed to influence flight behaviours. Whether seasonal polymorphism behaviour might be associated with divergent fore wing shapes. Pieris individuals in the spring are small and have elongated fore wings, traits correlate with low fly speed and acceleration, and in butterfly morphology is linked to adaptive flight behaviour remains unresolved. Here we compare the flight behaviours and wing morphologies of the spring and summer forms of two closely related butterfly species, Pieris napi and P. rapae. We first quantify three-dimensional flight behaviour by reconstructing individual flight trajectories using stereoscopic high-speed videography in an experimental outdoor cage. We then measure wing size and shape, which are characteristics assumed to influence flight behaviours in butterflies. We show that seasonal, but not interspecific, differences in flight high flight curvature. Large summer individuals exhibit rounded fore wings, which correlate with high flight speed, acceleration, turning acceleration, and advance ratio. Our study provides quantitative evidence of different flight behaviours between seasonal forms of Pieris butterflies, and these differences were better predicted by body size and forewing shape, rather than other factors (e.g., species identity, ambient temperature). This points toward a possible adaptive role of seasonal morphology determining flight behaviours, although this needs to be thoroughly investigated to distinguish the effects of microhabitat (e.g., behavioural thermoregulation, resource distribution between seasons, such as nectar and larval food plants), predator and parasitoid pressure, and possible sexual behavioural differences.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sexual dimorphism and plasticity in wing shape in three Diptera
M. Reis, N. Siomava, … N. Posnien·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2021
- Butterfly egg plasticity in physiologically and reproductive relevant traits: adaptation to climate?
Teun de Jong, Liana O Greenberg, … Graziella Iossa·Functional EcologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2026
- Heated debate: Is the seasonal polyphenism of Araschnia levana (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) driven by thermoregulation?
Daniel Linke, Jan Okrouhlík, … Irena Klečková·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2026
- Altitude and life-history shape the evolution of Heliconius wings
G. Montejo-Kovacevich, J. E. Smith, … C. Jiggins·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2019
- Larval growth rate affects wing shape more than eyespot size in the seasonally polyphenic butterfly Melanitis leda
Freerk Molleman, Megan E. Moore, … Vicencio Oostra·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2024
- A tale of winglets: evolution of flight morphology in stick insects
Y. Zeng, C. O'Maley, … R. Dudley·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2019