Journal of Neuroscience MethodsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Flexible modeling of large-scale neural network stimulation: electrical and optical extensions to The Virtual Electrode Recording Tool for EXtracellular Potentials (VERTEX)
Anne F. PierceiD, Larry ShupeiD, Julien BlochiD, Eberhard E. FetziD, Azadeh Yazdan-ShahmoradiD
Abstract
BackgroundComputational models that predict effects of neural stimulation can be used as a preliminary tool to inform in-vivo research, reducing the costs, time, and ethical considerations involved. However, current models do not support the diverse neural stimulation techniques used in-vivo, including the expanding selection of electrodes, stimulation modalities, and stimulation paradigms. New MethodTo develop a more comprehensive software, we created several extensions to The Virtual Electrode Recording Tool for EXtracellular Potentials (VERTEX), the MATLAB-based neural stimulation tool from Newcastle University. VERTEX simulates input currents in a large population of multi-compartment neurons within a small cortical slice to model electric field stimulation, while recording local field potentials (LFPs) and spiking activity. Our extensions to its existing electric field stimulation framework include allowing multiple pairs of parametrically defined electrodes and biphasic, bipolar stimulation delivered at programmable delays. To support the growing use of optogenetic approaches for targeted neural stimulation, we introduced a feature that models optogenetic stimulation through an additional VERTEX input function that converts irradiance to currents at optogenetically responsive neurons. Finally, we added extensions to allow complex stimulation protocols including paired-pulse, spatiotemporal patterned, and closed-loop stimulation. ResultsWe demonstrated our novel features using VERTEXs built-in functionalities, with results in alignment with other models and experimental work. ConclusionsOur extensions provide an all in one platform to efficiently and systematically test diverse, targeted, and individualized stimulation patterns.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.17
- Field percentile
- 48th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Development of a Primary Visual Cortex Model to Investigate Cortical Visual Prosthesis Stimulation
Jessica F. Woolley, Sabrina Jade Meikle, … Yan T. Wong·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2026
- NRV: An open framework for in silico evaluation of peripheral nerve electrical stimulation strategies
Thomas Couppey, Louis Regnacq, … Florian Kölbl·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2024
- Enabling Electric Field Model of Microscopically Realistic Brain
Zhen Qi, Gregory M. Noetscher, … Sergey N Makaroff·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2024
- STIMULUS: Noninvasive Dynamic Patterns of Neurostimulation using Spatio-Temporal Interference
Jiaming Cao, Pulkit Grover·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringPeer-reviewed·May 30, 2019
- Understanding responses to multi-electrode epiretinal stimulation using a biophysical model
Ramandeep S. Vilkhu, Praful Vasireddy, … E. J. Chichilnisky·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2024
- Precise control of neural activity using dynamically optimized electrical stimulation
Nishal P. Shah, AJ Phillips, … E. J. Chichilnisky·eLifePeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2024