henhaobio
Sign in

Genome biologyGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Retained introns in long RNA-seq reads are not reliably detected in sample-matched short reads

Julianne K. DavidiD, Sean K. MadeniD, Mary Ann WoodiD, Reid F. ThompsoniD, Abhinav NelloreiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

There is growing interest in retained introns in a variety of disease contexts including cancer and aging. Many software tools have been developed to detect retained introns from short RNA-seq reads, but reliable detection is complicated by overlapping genes and transcripts as well as the presence of unprocessed or partially processed RNAs. We compared introns detected by 5 tools using short RNA-seq reads with introns observed in long RNA-seq reads from the same biological specimens and found: (1) significant disagreement among tools (Fleiss{kappa} = 0.231) such that 52.4% of all detected intron retentions were not called by more than one tool; (2) that no tool achieved greater than 20% precision or 35% recall under generous conditions; and (3) that retained intron detectability was adversely affected by greater intron length and overlap with annotated exons.

Citations
33
FWCI
3.35
Field percentile
top 5%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBroséus '20Li '20Parker '21Križanović '17Lee '20Boratyn '19
70% semantic matchBioinformatics
Lucile Broséus, William Ritchie·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2020· 10 citations