Benchmarking phenology with a land surface model: an in- silico experiment for temperate forests

Plant phenology influences biotic interactions and the cycling of water, carbon, and nutrients, ultimately affecting global climate. Accurately quantifying phenological dynamics is therefore essential for ecological forecasting, yet estimates vary widely depending on data sources, smoothing approaches, and date-extraction techniques. For this reason, the selection of an appropriate processing pipeline requires benchmarking under controlled conditions. In this study, we use a Land Surface Model (LSM) to simulate ecosystem dynamics at four temperate forest sites under five lesser studied climate perturbations. The resulting synthetic dataset allows us to control for environmental conditions while comparing commonly used phenological detection methods (relative thresholds at 10%, 20% and 50%, highest rate of change, detection of inflection points in the curvature angle, detection of recovery and senescence points). Amongst tested methods, we find general agreement in responses to climate alterations, where inflection and low thresholds (10%) methods provide the closest match to the model predicted start of season, with a maximum discrepancy of 4 days. Higher thresholds (20%, 50%) are closer to the model predicted end of season, though discrepancies reach up to 10 days. High thresholds and rate-of-change methods also reliably detect the peak of season. We further show that some methods detect phenological responses missed by temperature-only type growing season, supporting the need for more realistic phenological representations in LSMs. Beyond evaluating extraction methods within a common framework, our study expands on the potential of using LSMs as sandboxes for ecological testing rather than solely predictive tools.