Protein stability models fail to capture epistatic interactions of double point mutations
Abstract
There is strong interest in accurate methods for predicting changes in protein stability resulting from amino acid mutations to the protein sequence. Recombinant proteins must often be stabilized to be used as therapeutics or reagents, and destabilizing mutations are implicated in a variety of diseases. Due to increased data availability and improved modeling techniques, recent studies have shown advancements in predicting changes in protein stability when a single point mutation is made. Less focus has been directed toward predicting changes in protein stability when there are two or more mutations, despite the significance of mutation clusters for disease pathways and protein design studies. Here, we analyze the largest available dataset of double point mutation stability and benchmark several widely used protein stability models on this and other datasets. We identify a blind spot in how predictors are typically evaluated on multiple mutations, finding that, contrary to assumptions in the field, current stability models are unable to consistently capture epistatic interactions between double mutations. We observe one notable deviation from this trend, which is that epistasis-aware models provide marginally better predictions on stabilizing double point mutations. We develop an extension of the ThermoMPNN framework for double mutant modeling as well as a novel data augmentation scheme which mitigates some of the limitations in available datasets. Collectively, our findings indicate that current protein stability models fail to capture the nuanced epistatic interactions between concurrent mutations due to several factors, including training dataset limitations and insufficient model sensitivity. SignificanceProtein stability is governed in part by epistatic interactions between energetically coupled residues. Prediction of these couplings represents the next frontier in protein stability modeling. In this work, we benchmark protein stability models on a large dataset of double point mutations and identify previously overlooked limitations in model design and evaluation. We also introduce several new strategies to improve modeling of epistatic couplings between protein point mutations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting protein stability changes upon mutations with dual-view ensemble learning from single sequence
Zhiwei Nie, Yiming Ma, … Jie Chen·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2025
- Evolutionary constraints improve protein large language model predictions for protein stability, binding regions and epistasis
Konstantina Tzavella, Catharina Olsen, Wim Vranken·Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2026
- MAXWELL: Calibrating the probabilistic outputs of protein language models to the mutation-induced stability change landscape
Mingchen Li, Xiaoran Cheng, … Yuanxi Yu·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026
- ProStab: Prediction of protein stability change upon mutations by protein language and inverse folding models
Hong‐Zhou Tan, Xiaowei Wei, … Yi Xiong·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2025
- GraphESMStable: A Deep Learning Framework for Protein Stability Prediction Fusing Pre-trained Sequence Models and Graph Neural Networks
Haoyu Zhang, Zhenyu Li, Jiahao He·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2026
- Exploring evolution to uncover insights into protein mutational stability
Pauline Hermans, Matsvei Tsishyn, … Fabrizio Pucci·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Dec 27, 2024