henhaobio
Sign in

PROTEOMICS - CLINICAL APPLICATIONSBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

An ensemble method for predicting and designing of druggable proteins.

Shipra JainiD, Srijanee Gupta, Gajendra P. S. RaghavaiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

In the past, numerous proteins/peptides have been discovered, which have a wide range of therapeutic properties like anticancer, antimicrobial, antihypertensive. Only few hundreds of proteins are druggable (approved by US FDA), most of the proteins fails in clinical trials. In this study, an attempt had been made to understand properties of FDA approved proteins to develop models for predicting druggable proteins. Our main dataset 356 FDA approved proteins as positive dataset and equal number of randomly selected proteins as negative dataset. We used 80% data for training and 20% for independent validation, no protein in validation dataset have more than 40% similarity with any protein in training dataset. We deployed machine learning based models using a five-fold cross-validation and test on validation dataset. Our random forest-based model developed using SVC-L1 selected features obtained maximum performance AUC of 0.80 with MCC 0.61 on validation data. In addition to this, we performed MERCI-based motif analysis to find motifs in druggable proteins. Finally, we developed an ensemble-based method combining best performing machine learning model with motifs and achieved AUC 0.92 with MCC 0.83 on independent validation dataset. We developed a web server and standalone package ThPPred to facilitate scientific community in predicting and designing druggable proteins (https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/thppred/). HighlightsO_LIAnalysis of FDA approved or druggable proteins C_LIO_LIDiscrimination of druggable and non-druggable proteins C_LIO_LIMachine learning based models for predicting druggable molecules C_LIO_LIIdentification of motifs in druggable proteins C_LIO_LIA web server for providing service to community C_LI

Citations
6
FWCI
8.21
Field percentile
top 3%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLópez‐Corté '19Yuan '20Halder '24Gingrich '26Sundar '20Borhani '25
79% semantic matchBioinformatics