Dynamic cognitive differences between internal and external attention are associated with depressive and anxiety disorders
Taiki OkaiD, Yutaro KoyamaiD, Akihiro T. SasakiiD, Misa Murakami, Nao KobayashiiD, Aurelio CorteseiD
Abstract
The internal/external attention framework characterises attention focused on internal representations, such as emotions, versus external representations, such as perceptual stimuli. The inability to focus ones attention is considered a critical factor in psychiatric disorders. While these different attentional foci are likely generated by the dynamic interplay of multiple cognitive processes, previous studies have generally examined single cognitive dimensions. We developed a new method, cognitive dynamic similarity analysis (C-DSA), to clarify how cognitive processes differ between experimental conditions. In an MR scanner, participants performed a word-processing task in which they focused on either their own emotions or the number of letters associated with a stimulus. To extract cognitive dynamics at the single-trial level, we applied cognitive dynamics estimation, a recently developed method that generates whole-brain activation maps for four cognitive dimensions (emotion processing, selective attention, self-referential thought, and working memory) using a meta-analytic platform. We then performed C-DSA to calculate the difference between internal and external attention for each cognitive dimension. C-DSA revealed significant differences between internal/external attention in all cognitive dimensions, but especially in emotion processing. Moreover, the difference between attention conditions of selective attention was negatively associated with the severity of depression and state-anxiety, but positively associated with trait-anxiety. Our findings suggest that C-DSA applies to both naturalistic and controlled dynamic processes and may be valuable in clinical settings by linking dynamic cognitive mechanisms with issues like ageing and psychiatric disorders. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=174 SRC="FIGDIR/small/615274v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (46K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a1bbb4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12a587forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1181b45org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a6716c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mapping the neural circuitry of cognitive restructuring in depressive and anxiety disorders
Alec J. Jamieson, Trevor Steward, … Ben J. Harrison·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2026
- Intrinsic activity temporal structure reactivity to behavioural state change is correlated with depressive symptoms
Niall W. Duncan, Tzu‐Yu Hsu, … Timothy Joseph Lane·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 10, 2020
- Behavioral and neuroimaging correlates of attentional biases to angry faces in individuals in remission from depression: a population-derived study
Jakub Nagrodzki, Luca Passamonti, … Noham Wolpe·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2023
- Infraslow dynamic patterns in human cortical networks track a spectrum of external to internal attention
Harrison N. Watters, Aleah Davis, … Shella Dawn Keilholz·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2025
- Dopamine challenge reduces mental state attribution accuracy
Bianca A. Schuster, Sophie Sowden, … Jennifer Louise Cook·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2023
- Hemispheric divergence of interoceptive processing across psychiatric disorders
Emily M. Adamic, Adam Robert Teed, … Sahib S. Khalsa·eLifePeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2024