Brazilian bryophytes: a national-scale comprehensive dataset of species richness and geographic distribution
Jailton Venilson Silva, Jhonyd Marmo, Kleberson jonata Tavares, Hermeson Cassiano Oliveira, Mercia Pereira Silva
Abstract
Bryophytes (Anthocerotophyta, Marchantiophyta, and Bryophyta) remain under-sampled in large-scale biodiversity databases in Brazil, despite their ecological importance. In Brazil, Flora e Funga do Brasil recognizes 1,618 bryophyte species distributed across six biomes that are increasingly threatened by anthropogenic pressures such as deforestation, agricultural expansion, and climate change. Nevertheless, knowledge of species geographic distributions remains fragmented and based on scattered records. Flora e Funga do Brasil serves as the official taxonomic reference for the country, providing the accepted species list and serving as a baseline for biodiversity studies. However, as it was designed as a nomenclatural and taxonomic checklist, it does not integrate primary occurrence records with geographic coordinates and collection dates. Consequently, occurrence data remain dispersed across herbaria, digital repositories, and the scientific literature, without dynamic updates linked to the official checklist. This disconnect between the taxonomic framework and primary occurrence records limits macroecological and biogeographical analyses at national scales, which depend on standardized georeferenced biodiversity databases. To address this gap, we compiled 102,528 bryophyte occurrence records from herbarium specimens, using data from GBIF and the speciesLink network, complemented by field collections from the Caatinga and records from the Cryptogamic Herbarium of the State University of Piaui. All records were georeferenced and curated, including verification of inconsistent coordinates, removal of duplicates, and taxonomic standardization using Bryonames. When available, information such as collection date and collector was retained. The dataset comprises 1,821 species, 125 families, and 442 genera. Bryophyta (mosses) was the most diverse group (1,056 spp., 84 families, 310 genera), followed by Marchantiophyta (745 spp., 37 families, 124 genera) and Anthocerotophyta (19 spp., four families, seven genera). Among mosses, the most species-rich families were Sphagnaceae (79 spp.), Fissidentaceae (76 spp.), and Pottiaceae (76 spp.). Among liverworts, Lejeuneaceae dominated with 335 species, followed by Lepidoziaceae (58 spp.) and Plagiochilaceae (51 spp.). Among hornworts, Anthocerotaceae, Dendrocerotaceae, and Notothyladaceae each included six species. Regionally, the Southeast showed the highest richness (1,338 spp.), followed by the South (974 spp.), Central-West (937 spp.), Northeast (897 spp.), and North (763 spp.). Regarding biomes, the Atlantic Forest (1,523 spp.) and Amazon (1,054 spp.) were the most species-rich, followed by the Cerrado (810 spp.), Caatinga (671 spp.), Pampa (269 spp.), and Pantanal (61 spp.). These patterns reflect both ecological gradients and historical sampling biases. This dataset bridges the gap between the official taxonomic checklist and primary occurrence data by integrating multiple sources into a standardized, openly accessible database. It provides a robust tool for studies in macroecology, biogeography, and conservation, enabling analyses of spatial patterns of species richness, endemism, and taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity across environmental gradients. It also supports species distribution modeling, climate change impact assessments, biodiversity hotspot identification, and conservation planning at regional and national scales. Users are encouraged to cite this article when using the dataset and to report downstream applications derived from it.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Consolidating the knowledge of the Caatinga's bryophytes: a comprehensive synthesis with new records
Jhonyd Jhonata de Oliveira Marmo, Jailton Venilson Ferreira da Silva, … Mércia Patrícia Pereira Silva·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2025
- How many bromeliads are there?
Georg Zizka, Maria Judith Carmona Higuita, … Alexander Zizka·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2026
- Baseline Inventory of the Bryophytes of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah
Theresa A. Clark·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2026
- Forest canopy cover composition and landscape influence over bryophytes communities in Nothofagus forests of southern Patagonia
M. D. Toro Manriquez, V. Ardiles, … G. Martinez Pastur·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2020
- Developing an approach to list bryophytes of conservation interests for England's Local Nature Recovery Strategies
Michael Davies, Jamie Bojko, … Ambroise G. Baker·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2025
- What we (don’t) know about global plant diversity
W. K. Cornwell, W. D. Pearse, … A. E. Zanne·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2018