Neuro-cognitive models of single-trial EEG measures describe latent effects of spatial attention during perceptual decision making
Amin Ghaderi-KangavariiD, Jamal Amani RadiD, Kourosh ParandiD, Michael D. NuneziD
Abstract
Visual perceptual decision-making involves multiple components including visual encoding, attention, accumulation of evidence, and motor execution. Recent research suggests that EEG oscillations can identify the time of encoding and the onset of evidence accumulation during perceptual decision-making. Although scientists show that spatial attention improves participant performance in decision making, little is know about how spatial attention influences the individual cognitive components that gives rise to that improvement in performance. We found evidence in this work that both visual encoding time (VET) before evidence accumulation and other non-decision time process after or during evidence accumulation are influenced by spatial top-down attention, but not evidence accumulation itself. Specifically we used an open-source data set in which participants were informed about the location of a target stimulus in the visual field on some trials during a face-car perceptual decision-making task. Fitting neural drift-diffusion models to response time, accuracy, and single-trial N200 latencies (~ 125 to 225 ms post-stimulus) of EEG allowed us to separate the processes of visual encoding and the decision process from other non-decision time processes such as motor execution. These models were fit in a single step in a hierarchical Bayesian framework. Model selection criteria and comparison to model simulations show that spatial attention manipulates both VET and other non-decision time process. We discuss why spatial attention may affect other non-evidence accumulation processes, such as motor execution time (MET), and why this may seem unexpected given the literature. We make recommendations for future work on this topic.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How spatial attention affects the decision process: looking through the lens of Bayesian hierarchical diffusion model & EEG analysis
Amin Ghaderi-Kangavari, Kourosh Parand, … Jamal Amani Rad·Journal of Cognitive PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2023
- The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making
Michael D. Nunez, Aishwarya K. Gosai, … Ramesh Srinivasan·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2019
- Undivided attention: The temporal effects of attention dissociated from decision, memory, and expectation
Denise Moerel, Tijl Grootswagers, … Anina N. Rich·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2022
- Motor effort biases perceptual decisions through later-stage evidence accumulation rather than early sensory-attentional processing
Ningjing Cui, Jeroen B. J. Smeets, … Bernadette C.M. van Wijk·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2026
- EEG reveals how space acts as a late heuristic of time
Fabrizio Doricchi, Gabriele Scozia, … Stefano Lasaponara·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 8, 2026
- Evidence accumulation during perceptual decision-making is sensitive to the dynamics of attentional selection
Dragan Rangelov, Jason B. Mattingley·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2020