henhaobio
Sign in

Brain stimulationNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability

Miles WischnewskiiD, Zachary J. HaighiD, Sina ShirinpouriD, Ivan AlekseichukiD, Alexander OpitziD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Neural oscillations in the primary motor cortex (M1) shape corticospinal excitability. Power and phase of ongoing mu (8-13 Hz) and beta (14-30 Hz) activity may mediate motor cortical output. However, the functional dynamics of both mu and beta phase and power relationships and their interaction, are largely unknown. Here, we employ recently developed real-time targeting of the mu and beta rhythm, to apply phase-specific brain stimulation and probe motor corticospinal excitability non-invasively. For this, we used instantaneous read-out and analysis of ongoing oscillations, targeting four different phases (0{degrees}, 90{degrees}, 180{degrees}, and 270{degrees}) of mu and beta rhythms with suprathreshold single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to M1. Ensuing motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the right first dorsal interossei muscle were recorded. Twenty healthy adults took part in this double-blind randomized crossover study. Mixed model regression analyses showed significant phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal output by both mu and beta rhythm. Strikingly, these modulations exhibit a double dissociation. MEPs are larger at the mu trough and rising phase and smaller at the peak and falling phase. For the beta rhythm we found the opposite behavior. Also, mu power, but not beta power, was positively correlated with corticospinal output. Power and phase effects did not interact for either rhythm, suggesting independence between these aspects of oscillations. Our results provide insights into real-time motor cortical oscillation dynamics, which offers the opportunity to improve the effectiveness of TMS by specifically targeting different frequency bands.

Citations
100
FWCI
7.30
Field percentile
top 2%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISPerera '24Keute '23Hussain '19Madsen '19Nuyts '26Sarasquete '26
88% semantic matchNeuroscience
Nipun D. Perera, Miles Wischnewski, Ivan Alekseichuk+2 more·eNeuro·Nov 1, 2024· 18 citations