Phase-specific stimulation reveals consistent sinusoidal modulation of human corticospinal excitability along the oscillatory beta cycle
Marius KeuteiD, Julian-Samuel GebühriD, Robert GuggenbergeriD, Bettina Hanna TrunkiD, Alireza GharabaghiiD
Abstract
The responsiveness of neuronal populations to incoming information fluctuates. Retrospective analyses of randomly applied stimuli reveal a neural input-output relationship along the intrinsic oscillatory cycle. Prospectively harnessing this biological mechanism would necessitate frequency- and phase-specificity, intra- and inter-individual consistency, and instantaneous access to the oscillatory cycle. We used a novel real-time approach to electroencephalography-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation to precisely target 8 equidistant phases of the oscillatory cycle in the human motor cortex of male and female healthy participants. The phase-dependency of corticospinal excitability was investigated in ten different intrinsic frequencies (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40Hz) and indexed by motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in the corresponding forearm muscle. On both the individual and group level, we detected a consistent sinusoidal MEP modulation along the oscillatory cycle at 24Hz ({chi}22 =9.2, p=.01), but not at any other target frequency (all {chi}22 .08). Moreover, cross-validations showed also at 24Hz the highest consistency of the optimal phase between prospective (real-time) and retrospective (out-of-sample) testing (r=.605, p<.001), and across experimental sessions on three different days (r[≥].45). The optimal corticospinal signal transmission was at the transition from the trough to the rising flank of the oscillatory 24Hz cycle. Integrating real-time measurement and brain stimulation revealed that the sinusoidal input-output relationship of corticospinal signal transmission is frequency- and phase specific, and consistent within and across individuals and sessions. In future, this approach allows to selectively and repetitively target windows of increased responsiveness, and to thereby investigate potential cumulative effects on plasticity induction.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability
Miles Wischnewski, Zachary J. Haigh, … Alexander Opitz·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Aug 11, 2022
- State dependent motor cortex stimulation reveals distinct mechanisms for corticospinal excitability and cortical responses
Nipun D. Perera, Miles Wischnewski, … Alexander Opitz·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024
- Beta rhythm events predict corticospinal motor output
Sara J. Hussain, Leonardo G. Cohen, Marlene Bönstrup·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2019
- Not Just Noise: Aperiodic Brain Activity Reflects Corticospinal Excitability
Juliana Hougland, Miriam Kirchhoff, … Ulf Ziemann·bioRxiv·May 5, 2026
- Target engagement in human motor cortex induced by constant sinusoidal and amplitude-modulated transcranial AC stimulation
Mitsuaki Takemi, Mads Alexander Just Madsen, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2025
- No trace of phase: Corticomotor excitability is not tuned by phase of pericentral mu-rhythm
Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen, Anke Ninija Karabanov, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·May 9, 2019