Talking avatars can differentially modulate cortical speech tracking in the high and in the low delta band
Jasmin RiegeliD, Alina SchülleriD, C. JehniD, Alexander WißmanniD, Steffen ZeileriD, Dorothea KolossaiD, Tobias ReichenbachiD
Abstract
In noisy listening environments, visual cues from a speakers face can significantly boost speech compre-hension. The underlying audiovisual integration in the brain involves neural tracking of audiovisual speech features. Moreover, lip reading in silence is associated with tracking of the speech envelope in the low-delta frequency band (0.5 - 1 Hz). Recently, digital avatars have emerged that can support speech comprehen-sion. Yet, it remains unclear how the human brain integrates such artificial visual signals with natural speech. Here, we employed magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure the neural response to a natural video, an avatar generated by deep neural networks, and a degraded video serving as a control. We demonstrate that the avatar can enhance speech-in-noise comprehension to a similar degree as the degraded video, although less than the natural video. We further identify a late response at 600 ms in the neural tracking of the audi-tory cortex in the high delta band (1 - 4 Hz) that predicts audiovisual speech comprehension. In contrast, we found that neural tracking in the low delta band is related to silent lip-reading performance. Importantly, the tracking in the low delta band evoked by the avatars is much weaker and occurs earlier than that elicited by the other audiovisual stimuli. Neural tracking in the theta band (4 - 8 Hz) is not involved in audiovisual integration. Our results show that the low delta band and the high delta band play clearly distinct roles in visual-only and audiovisual speech processing, and suggest potential avenues for further boosting the abilities of avatars to support speech comprehension. Significance StatementUnderstanding a conversational partner is essential for everyday communication. Yet, many people -- due to aging or other factors -- struggle to follow speech in noisy environments. Seeing the speakers face can greatly enhance speech comprehension, but visual cues are often unavailable, such as during public announcements or telephone conversations. Digital avatars offer a promising alternative, but how the brain integrates audiovisual information from such artificial sources remains unclear. Using magnetoencephalog-raphy (MEG), we investigated how the brain processes and integrates speech when visual information is provided by either natural or artificial (avatar-based) signals. Our findings reveal both shared and distinct neural mechanisms of audiovisual integration, providing critical insight into how visual input can support speech understanding in challenging listening conditions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differential auditory and visual phase-locking are observed during audio-visual benefit and silent lip-reading for speech perception
Máté Aller, Heidi Solberg Økland, … Matthew H. Davis·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2022
- Decreasing hearing ability does not lead to improved visual speech extraction as revealed in a neural speech tracking paradigm
Chandra Leon Haider, Anne Hauswald, Nathan Weisz·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2024
- Neurophysiological indices of audiovisual speech integration are enhanced at the phonetic level for speech in noise
Aisling E. O’Sullivan, Michael J. Crosse, … Edmund C. Lalor·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2020
- Visual and auditory cortices represent acoustic speech-related information during silent lip reading
Felix Bröhl, Anne Keitel, Christoph Kayser·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2022
- Early visual cortex tracks speech envelope in the absence of visual input
Evgenia Bednaya, Bojana Mirkovic, … Davide Bottari·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2022
- The cortical contribution to the speech-FFR is not modulated by visual information
Jasmin Riegel, Alina Schüller, … Tobias Reichenbach·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2026