Degradation levels of continuous speech affect neural speech tracking and alpha power differently
Anne HauswaldiD, Anne KeiteliD, Ya‐Ping CheniD, Sebastian RöschiD, Nathan WeisziD
Abstract
Understanding degraded speech, e.g. following a hearing damage, can pose a challenge. Previous attempts to quantify speech intelligibility in neural terms have usually focused on one of two measures, namely low-frequency speech-brain synchronization or alpha power modulations. However, reports have been mixed concerning the modulation of these measures, an issue aggravated by the fact that they have normally been studied separately. Using a parametric speech degradation approach, we present MEG studies that overcome this shortcoming. In a first study, participants listened to unimodal auditory speech with three different levels of degradation (original, 7-channel and 3-channel vocoding). Intelligibility declined with declining clarity, implemented by fewer vocoding channels but was still intelligible to some extent even for the lowest clarity level used (3-channel vocoding). Low- frequency (1-7 Hz) speech tracking suggested a u-shaped relationship with strongest effects for the medium degraded speech (7-channel) in bilateral auditory and left frontal regions. To follow up on this finding, we implemented three additional vocoding levels (5-channel, 2- channel, 1-channel) in a second MEG study. Using this wider range of degradation, the speech-brain synchronization showed a similar pattern for the degradation levels used in the first study but further shows that when speech becomes unintelligible, synchronization declines again. The relationship differed for alpha power, which continued to decrease across vocoding levels reaching a floor effect for 5-channel vocoding. Predicting subjective intelligibility based on models either combining both measures or each measure alone, showed superiority of the combined model. Our findings underline that speech tracking and alpha power are modified differently by the degree of degradation of continuous speech but together contribute to the subjective understanding of speech.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 46
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Speech intelligibility changes the temporal evolution of neural speech tracking
Ya‐Ping Chen, Fabian Schmidt, … Nathan Weisz·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2023
- Neural tracking of speech does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility
Anne Kösem, Bohan Dai, … Peter Hagoort A·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2022
- Neural Tracking Measures of Speech Intelligibility: Manipulating Intelligibility while Keeping Acoustics Unchanged
I. M. Dushyanthi Karunathilake, Joshua P. Kulasingham, Jonathan Z. Simon·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2023
- Parametric cognitive load reveals hidden costs in the neural processing of perfectly intelligible degraded speech
Harrison Ritz, Conor J. Wild, Ingrid S. Johnsrude·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 4, 2022
- Neural decoding of the speech envelope: Effects of intelligibility and spectral degradation
Alexis Deighton MacIntyre, Robert P. Carlyon, Tobias Goehring·Trends in HearingPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Neural speech tracking shifts from the syllabic to the modulation rate of speech as intelligibility decreases
Fabian Schmidt, Ya‐Ping Chen, … Nathan Weisz·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 23, 2023