Veterinary insecticides in wild bird nests: emerging contaminants in urban and protected forest habitats
Zsófia Varga‐SzilayiD, Olivér Csíkvári, Olga Ulbert, Ivett PipolyiD, Gábor SeressiD
Abstract
Veterinary ectoparasiticides widely used on companion animals often contain synthetic insecticides whose agricultural applications have been restricted in the European Union because of environmental concerns. These neurotoxic compounds can persist on animal fur and enter surrounding environments, potentially exposing non-target organisms. The Great Tit (Parus major), a common passerine in both urban and forest habitats, frequently incorporates animal fur in nest linings, thereby creating a potential exposure route for breeding adults and nestlings. We analysed fur-containing nest material collected from 63 Great Tit nests in artificial nest boxes at an urban site and a nearby protected forest in Hungary during the 2025 breeding season, sampling at mid-nestling stage and also after fledging. Using HPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS, we detected several veterinary ectoparasiticides in nest materials, including fipronil, fipronil sulfone, imidacloprid, and permethrin. Acetamiprid was found only in urban nests, indicating additional, non-veterinary environmental sources. Multiple insecticides were present in nest material, with higher contamination levels and greater compound diversity in urban compared to forest nests. Residues were present at both sampling times but declined over the course of the breeding cycle. Although contamination was not associated with the measured reproductive parameters of Great Tits, our findings show that veterinary ectoparasiticides can contaminate wild bird nests, including those in protected forest ecosystems. This highlights a previously under-recognised pathway linking companion animal treatments to wildlife exposure and underscores the need to assess the ecological risks and trade-offs associated with widespread veterinary insecticide use. HighlightsO_LIVeterinary ectoparasiticides were detected in urban and forest Great Tit nests C_LIO_LIUrban nests contained higher contamination levels and greater compound diversity C_LIO_LIAcetamiprid occurred only in urban nests, indicating additional environmental inputs C_LIO_LIProtected forests also exposed to fipronil, fipronil sulfone and permethrin C_LIO_LIBird nests reveal an overlooked pathway linking pet treatments to wildlife exposure C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 30th percentile
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Higher frequency of extra-pair offspring in urban than forest broods of great tits (Parus major)
- Enemy mitigation in farmlands: Intensive agriculture impacts avian nesting and subsequent ectoparasite infestation
Simon Coroller-Chouraki, Allen Bush‐Beaupré, … Marc Bélisle·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2026
- Urbanization Affects Nest Material Composition and Use of Anthropogenic Materials in Blue Tit Nests
Joseph Roy, Davide M. Dominoni·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2024
- Urban green infrastructure fails to mitigate exposure to mercury with increasing pollution levels: evidence from corvids
Michał Ciach, Łukasz J. Binkowski, … Katarzyna Kucharska·The Science of The Total EnvironmentPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2026
- Parasitism by, species composition, morphometry, and parasitoidism of Protocalliphora bird blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Quebec s farmlands: a 16-year dataset
Simon Coroller-Chouraki, Jade Savage, … Marc Bélisle·The Canadian EntomologistPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Tick infestation probability increases with human recreation and exploratory behaviour in great tits
R. E. Rollins, A. Mouchet, … N. J. Dingemanse·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2020