Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

A response to Zhang et al. (2018), \"Can Mouse-tracking Reveal Attribute Processing Speeds in Dietary Self-control? Commentary on Sullivan et al. (2015) and Lim et al. (2018)\"

Nicolette J. SullivaniD, Cendri A.C. HutchersoniD, Alison M. HarrisiD, Antonio RangeliD

Abstract

Introduction Introduction References In Sullivan et al. (2015), mouse-tracking was used in a food choice paradigm to test two related hypotheses: 1) that there are differences in the relative speed with which the decision-making circuitry computes and weights the value of attributes like health and taste; and, 2) that individual differences in these relative speeds are associated with individual differences in the ability to make healthy dietary choices. Consistent with these hypotheses, a regression analysis of the mouse-tracking paths found that health became significantly predictive of the mouses angle of movement ~195 ms later than taste, on average. Moreover, individual dietary self-control varied with estimates of the individual differences in the relative speed with which taste (tTaste) and health (tHealth) entered the decision-making process. Similar results have ...

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBarakchian '21Anversa '25Swieten '21Takehana '24Versace '18Fievez '24
67% semantic matchAnimal Behavior & Cognition
Z. Barakchian, A. R. Beharelle, T. Hare·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2021