Natural selection and neutral mutations through the lens of viruses

Abstract

The Neutral Theory and the Modern Synthesis, a modified version of Darwins theory, have been arguing for decades about the influence of natural selection on molecular evolution1-10. Here we elucidate through the lens of viruses that a frequently used method11-17 employing the ratio of nonsynonymous versus synonymous substitution rates has dramatically underestimated the influence of natural selection on molecular evolution. We also find novel evidence from viral sequences to support the co-existence of the crucial role of natural selection in molecular evolution and the ubiquity of neutral mutations. The co-existence has perplexed biologists for decades2,5,7. We then elucidate for the first time the causality between natural selection and the ubiquity of neutral mutations with a novel interpretation of natural selection. This novel interpretation incorporates biochemistry, genetics, epigenetics, physiology, and dynamics. It holds that natural selection acts directly on the overall phenotypic performance of organisms and indirectly on each genomic site or phenotypic trait. It highlights not only restrictions and competitions but also freedom and diversity, besides the overall harmonious development of organisms and human societies. Therefore, this novel interpretation could have far-reaching implications in the natural and social sciences.