henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint

CellTosg2Sequence: A Unified Text-Omics-Signaling-Graph Large Language Model for Single-Cell Analysis

Weihang Chen, Mingrui Ye, Tianqi XuiD, Di HuangiD, Heming ZhangiD, Hao LiiD, Wenyu LiiD, Yixin Chen, Michael A. ProvinceiD, Philip PayneiD, Fuhai LiiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

In single-cell (sc)-based scientific discovery, text-formatted biomedical prior knowledge and signaling graphs are essential for annotating and interpreting numeric sc-omics data and for generating novel testable hypotheses. A major limitation of existing single-cell large language models (scLLMs) is that they rely on numeric expression data with gene names as the only textual signal, while comprehensive biomedical priors -- cellular localization, gene function, disease associations, and signaling interaction patterns -- remain absent from the model input. We introduce CellTosg2Sequence, a textual-prior- and signaling-graph-augmented cell-omics-sentence language model. A lightweight heterogeneous graph encoder maps a curated 62,507-node biomedical knowledge graph (KG) into compact virtual tokens that are prepended to each cell sentence, allowing the language model to condition on biological structure with minimal sequence-length overhead. We train CellTosg2Sequence with a three-stage objective: Stage I anchors the KG channel under autoregressive language-model pretraining, leveraging Qwen2.5-32Bs own language reasoning for rapid KG alignment; Stage II aligns labels via supervised fine-tuning with KG-anchored InfoNCE; Stage III applies Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with an ontology-hierarchy reward, enabling free-generation cell-type prediction that generalizes beyond the closed training vocabulary. Across multiple benchmarks and ablation experiments, CellTosg2Sequence outperforms strong baselines. All results are achieved with lightweight LoRA training and a single unified checkpoint. Data ethicsThis work uses publicly available single-cell datasets from the Human Cell Atlas (https://www.humancellatlas.org) and the Tahoe-100M consortium. All HCA constituent studies were collected under appropriate donor consent and institutional oversight as described in their original publications; we perform computational re-analysis only and introduce no new human subjects data. HCA data access follows the HCA Data Portal terms of use. No new patient data are collected in this study; no additional IRB approval is required for this secondary computational analysis.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISXiao '25Wen '23Rizvi '25Krissmer '25Fang '25Zhang '25
67% semantic matchBioinformatics
Chuxi Xiao, Yuang Ding, Haiyang Bian+3 more·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2025· 1 citations