bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Hierachical Resampling for Bagging in Multi-Study Prediction with Applications to Human Neurochemical Sensing
Gabriel C. LoewingeriD, Prasad PatiliD, Kenneth T. KishidaiD, Giovanni ParmigianiiD
Abstract
We propose the "study strap ensemble," which combines advantages of two common approaches to fitting prediction models when multiple training datasets ("studies") are available: pooling studies and fitting one model versus averaging predictions from multiple models each fit to individual studies. The study strap ensemble fits models to bootstrapped datasets, or "pseudo-studies." These are generated by resampling from multiple studies with a hierarchical resampling scheme that generalizes the randomized cluster bootstrap. The study strap is controlled by a tuning parameter that determines the proportion of observations to draw from each study. When the parameter is set to its lowest value, each pseudo-study is resampled from only a single study. When it is high, the study strap ignores the multi-study structure and generates pseudo-studies by merging the datasets and drawing observations like a standard bootstrap. We empirically show the optimal tuning value often lies in between, and prove that special cases of the study strap draw the merged dataset and the set of original studies as pseudo-studies. We extend the study strap approach with an ensemble weighting scheme that utilizes information in the distribution of the covariates of the test dataset. Our work is motivated by neuroscience experiments using real-time neurochemical sensing during awake behavior in humans. Current techniques to perform this kind of research require measurements from an electrode placed in the brain during awake neurosurgery and rely on prediction models to estimate neurotransmitter concentrations from the electrical measurements recorded by the electrode. These models are trained by combining multiple datasets that are collected in vitro under heterogeneous conditions in order to promote accuracy of the models when applied to data collected in the brain. A prevailing challenge is deciding how to combine studies or ensemble models trained on different studies to enhance model generalizability. Our methods produce marked improvements in simulations and in this application. All methods are available in the studyStrap CRAN package.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bootstrap aggregating improves the generalizability of Connectome Predictive Modelling
David A. O’Connor, Evelyn M. R. Lake, … Robert Todd Constable·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 13, 2021
- Tree-weighting for multi-study ensemble learners
Maya Ramchandran, Prasad Patil, Giovanni Parmigiani·Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB)Peer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2019
- Crossvalidation in brain imaging analysis
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2015
- Hierarchical Bayesian inference for concurrent model fitting and comparison for group studies
Payam Piray, Amir Dezfouli, … Nathaniel D. Daw·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2019
- Hierarchical Bayesian Models of Reinforcement Learning: Introduction and comparison to alternative methods
Camilla van Geen, Raphael T. Gerraty·Journal of Mathematical PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 18, 2021
- Multi-Model and Network Inference Based on Ensemble Estimates: Avoiding the Madness of Crowds
Michael P. H. Stumpf·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2020