Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
3D segmentation of perivascular spaces on T1-weighted 3 Tesla MR images with a convolutional autoencoder and a U-shaped neural network
Philippe BoutinaudiD, Ami TsuchidaiD, Alexandre LaurentiD, Filipa Adonias, Zahra HanifehlouiD, Victor NozaisiD, Violaine VerrecchiaiD, Leonie Lampe, Junyi ZhangiD, Yi‐Cheng ZhuiD, Christophe TzourioiD, Bernard M. MazoyeriD, Marc JoliotiD
Abstract
We implemented a deep learning (DL) algorithm for the 3-dimensional segmentation of perivascular spaces (PVSs) in deep white matter (DWM) and basal ganglia (BG). This algorithm is based on an autoencoder and a U-shaped network (U-net), and was trained and tested using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from a large database of 1,832 healthy young adults. An important feature of this approach is the ability to learn from relatively sparse data, which gives the present algorithm a major advantage over other DL algorithms. Here, we trained the algorithm with 40 T1-weighted MRI datasets in which all "visible" PVSs were manually annotated by an experienced operator. After learning, performance was assessed using another set of 10 MRI scans from the same database in which PVSs were also traced by the same operator and were checked by consensus with another experienced operator. The Sorensen-Dice coefficients for PVS voxel detection in DWM (resp. BG) were 0.51 (resp. 0.66), and 0.64 (resp. 0.71) for PVS cluster detection (volume threshold of 0.5 within a range of 0 to 1). Dice values above 0.90 could be reached for detecting PVSs larger than 10 mm3 and 0.95 for PVSs larger than 15 mm3. We then applied the trained algorithm to the rest of the database (1,782 individuals). The individual PVS load provided by the algorithm showed a high agreement with a semi-quantitative visual rating done by an independent expert rater, both for DWM and for BG. Finally, we applied the trained algorithm to an age-matched sample from another MRI database acquired using a different scanner. We obtained a very similar distribution of PVS load, demonstrating the interoperability of this algorithm.
- Citations
- 84
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multi-Contrast MRI Inputs Enable Self-Consistent Tissue Segmentation & Robust Perivascular Space Identification
Jeffrey L. Gunter, Gregory M. Preboske, … Clifford R. Jack·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2026
- Applying Unet for extraction of vascular metrics from T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI
Farnaz Orooji, Russell Butler·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2022
- Volumetric Segmentation and Characterisation of the Paracingulate Sulcus on MRI Scans
Junwei Yang, Duo Wang, … Arnaud Cachia·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2019
- tUbe net: a generalisable deep learning tool for 3D vessel segmentation
N. A. Holroyd, Z. Li, … S. Walker-Samuel·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2023
- Deep Bayesian networks for uncertainty estimation and adversarial resistance of white matter hyperintensity segmentation
Parisa Mojiri Forooshani, Mahdi Biparva, … Maged Goubran·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2022
- Perivascular Space Semi-Automatic Segmentation (PVSSAS): A Tool for Segmenting, Viewing and Editing Perivascular Spaces
D. Smith, Gaurav Verma, … Laurel S. Morris·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2020