Validation of cross progeny variance genomic prediction using simulations and experimental data in winter elite bread wheat
Claire OgetiD, Emmanuel Heumez, Laure Duchalais, Ellen Goudemand-Dugué, François‐Xavier Oury, Jean-Michel ElseniD, Sophie BouchetiD
Abstract
The utilization of genomic prediction is increasing in crop breeding to parental selection and mating. The Usefulness Criterion (UC) that considers Parental Mean (PM), progeny Standard Deviation (SD) and selection intensity has been shown to increase the likelihood to get outstanding progenies compared to mating using PM alone while maintaining more diversity in the germplasm for next generations. This study estimates our ability to predict UC and its two components (PM and SD) using simulations and experimental data (73-101 winter bread wheat crosses depending on the trait, with 54.8 progenies on average) including heading date, plant height, grain protein content and yield evaluation. The training population comprises 2,146 French varieties registered during the last 20 years and INRAE-AO breeding lines. According to simulations, prediction ability increases with heritability and progeny size and decreases with QTL number, most notably for SD. We used as a reference a TRUE scenario, i.e. an optimal situation where TP is infinite and where marker effects are perfectly estimated. SD was strongly impacted by the quality of marker effect estimates. In simulations, considering the error in marker effect estimates improved SD predictions for quantitative traits with low heritability. In experimental data, the interest of this method was limited. PM and UC were reasonably predicted for all traits, while SD was more challenging. This pioneering study experimentally validates genomic prediction of progeny variance. The ability of prediction depends on trait architecture while the realization of cross potential in the field necessitates a sufficient number of progenies. Key messageFrom simulations and experimental data, the quality of cross progeny variance genomic predictions may be high, but depends on trait architecture and necessitates sufficient number of progenies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Field percentile
- top 17%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
Stefan McKinnon Edwards, Jaap B. Buntjer, … John M. Hickey·Theoretical and Applied GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2019
- Across-population genomic prediction in grapevine opens up promising prospects for breeding
Charlotte Brault, Vincent Segura, … Agnès Doligez·Horticulture ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Comparison of genomic-enabled cross selection criteria for the improvement of inbred line breeding populations
Alice Danguy des Déserts, Nicolas Durand, … Sophie Bouchet·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2023
- Reaction Norm Modeling of High-Dimensional Genomic and Environmental Data Improves Prediction Accuracy in Winter Wheat
Shailesh Raj Acharya, Julián García‐Abadillo, … Nonoy B. Bandillo·The Plant GenomePeer-reviewed·Oct 27, 2026
- Genomic prediction for malting quality traits in practical barley breeding programs
Pernille Merete Sarup, Vahid Edriss, … Just Jensen·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2020
- Usefulness Criterion and post-selection Parental Contributions in Multi-parental Crosses: Application to Polygenic Trait Introgression
Antoine Allier, Laurence Moreau, … Christina Lehermeier·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2019