bioRxivPharmacology & ToxicologyPreprint
Drug prescription pattern in European neonatal units
I. Mesek, G. Nellis, J. Lass, T. Metsvaht, H. Varendi, H. Visk, M. A. Turner, A. J. Nunn, J. Duncan, I. Lutsar
Abstract
BackgroundHospitalized neonates receive the highest number of drugs compared to all other age groups, but consumption rates vary between studies depending on patient characteristics and local practices. There are no large scale international studies on drug use in neonatal units. We aimed to describe drug use in European neonatal units and characterize its associations with geographic region and gestational age (GA).\n\nMethodsA one-day point prevalence study (PPS) was performed as part of the European Study of Neonatal Exposure to Excipients (ESNEE) from January to June 2012. All neonatal prescriptions and demographic data were registered in a web-based database. The impact of GA and region on prescription rate were analyzed with logistic regression.\n\nResultsIn total, 21 European countries with 89 neonatal units participated. Altogether 2173 prescriptions given to 726 neonates were registered. The 10 drugs with the highest prescription rate were multivitamins, vitamin D, caffeine, gentamicin, amino acids for parenteral nutrition, phytomenadione, ampicillin, benzylpenicillin, fat emulsion for parenteral nutrition and probiotics. The six most commonly prescribed ATC groups (alimentary tract and metabolism, blood and blood-forming organs, systemic anti-infectives, nervous, respiratory and cardiovascular system) covered 98% of prescriptions. GA significantly affected the use of all commonly used drug groups. Geographic region influenced the use of alimentary tract and metabolism, blood and blood-forming organs, systemic anti-infectives, nervous and respiratory system drugs.\n\nConclusionsWhile GA-dependent differences in neonatal drug use were expected, regional variations (except for systemic anti-infectives) indicate a need for cooperation in developing harmonized evidence-based guidelines and suggest priorities for collaborative work.
- organism: human
- assay: clinical cohort / trial
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The magnitude of neonatal mortality and its predictors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yared Asmare, Wondimeneh Shibabaw Shiferaw, … Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold·bioRxiv·May 5, 2019
- Patchwork of contrasting medication cultures across the USA
Rachel Melamed, Andrey Rzhetsky·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2018
- Perspectives of pharmacy employees on an inappropriate use of antimicrobials in Kathmandu, Nepal
N. Shrestha, S. MANANDHAR, … A. Karkey·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2022
- Why did some practices not implement new antibiotic prescribing guidelines on urinary tract infection? A cohort study and survey in NHS England primary care
R. Croker, A. J. Walker, B. Goldacre·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2018
- Risk of hypoglycemia induced by pivalate-conjugated antibiotics in young children: a population-based retrospective study in Japan
Tatebe Yasuhisa, Toshihiro Koyama, … Shiro Hinotsu·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2018
- Non-medical prescribing policy in the United Kingdom National Health Service: systematic review and narrative synthesis
E. Graham-Clarke, A. Rushton, … J. Marriott·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2019