Non-medical prescribing policy in the United Kingdom National Health Service: systematic review and narrative synthesis
Abstract
Non-medical prescribing was introduced into the United Kingdom (UK) to improve patient care, through extending healthcare professionals roles. More recent government health service policy focuses on the increased demand and the need for efficiency. This systematic review aimed to describe any changes in government policy position and the role that non-medical prescribing plays in healthcare provision.\n\nThe systematic review and narrative analysis included policy and consultation documents that describe independent non-medical prescribing. A pre-defined protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015019786). Professional body websites, other relevant websites and the following databases were searched to identify relevant papers: HMIC, Lexis Nexis, UK Government Web Archive, UKOP, UK Parliamentary Papers and Web of Science. Papers published between 2006 and February 2018 were included.\n\nFollowing exclusions, 45 papers were selected for review; 23 relating to policy or strategy and 22 to consultations. Of the former, 13/23 were published 2006-2010 and the remainder since 2013. Two main themes are identified: chronological aspects and healthcare provision. The impact of government change and associated major healthcare service reorganisation resulted in the publication gap for policy documents. The role of non-medical prescribing has evolved to support efficient service delivery, and cost reduction. For many professions, prescribing appears embedded into practice; however, pharmacy continues to produce policy documents, suggesting that prescribing is not yet perceived as normal practice.\n\nPrescribing appears to be more easily adopted into practice where it can form part of the overall care of the patient. Where new roles are required to be established, then prescribing takes longer to be universally adopted. While this research concerns policy and practice in the UK, this aspect of role adoption has wider potential implications.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Physiotherapist and Podiatrist Independent Prescribing in the United Kingdom: A quasi experimental study
N. Carey, J. Edwards, … K. Stenner·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2020
- Why did some practices not implement new antibiotic prescribing guidelines on urinary tract infection? A cohort study and survey in NHS England primary care
R. Croker, A. J. Walker, B. Goldacre·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2018
- Patchwork of contrasting medication cultures across the USA
Rachel Melamed, Andrey Rzhetsky·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2018
- Perspectives of pharmacy employees on an inappropriate use of antimicrobials in Kathmandu, Nepal
N. Shrestha, S. MANANDHAR, … A. Karkey·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2022
- First Indications for Long-Term Benzodiazepine and Z-drugs use in the United Kingdom
J. Davies, T. C. Rae, L. Montagu·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2016
- Assessment of whether published non-Cochrane systematic reviews of nursing follow the review protocols registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): A comparative study