An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Early- versus Late-Stage Classification of Breast Cancer from Gene Expression, with Co-expression Network Analysis
Abstract
Anatomical stage is a principal determinant of treatment and prognosis in breast cancer, yet it is unclear how much information about stage is carried by the transcriptome of the primary tumour. We asked whether an a priori panel of 65 cancer-related genes can distinguish early-stage (AJCC Stage I-II) from late-stage (Stage III-IV) breast cancer, and which genes contribute to any signal. RNA-seq expression and pathologic stage for The Cancer Genome Atlas breast invasive carcinoma cohort (TCGA-BRCA) were obtained from the UCSC Xena platform. After restricting the data to primary tumours with a known stage, 1,075 tumours were analysed (805 early, 270 late) and split into stratified training (n = 860) and held-out test (n = 215) sets. Logistic regression, a support vector machine, random forest and gradient boosting were tuned by stratified five-fold cross-validation, with median imputation, standardisation and SMOTE oversampling fitted on training data only and classification thresholds chosen on out-of-fold training predictions. On the test set, Logistic Regression had the highest ROC-AUC, 0.618 (95% CI 0.530-0.704), with balanced accuracy 0.578, sensitivity 0.741 and specificity 0.416; differences in AUC between models were not statistically significant (DeLong p = 0.199-0.585). Permutation importance in the Gradient Boosting model ranked POU5F1, FLT3 and NOTCH1 highest, but this model's AUC confidence interval included 0.5, so the ranking is exploratory. No gene was differentially expressed between stage groups after false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction (smallest FDR = 0.057, CD44). A co-expression network built from training tumours identified REL, EP300 and ESR1 as the most connected genes, a property that reflects co-expression rather than regulation or association with stage. Limitations include a single cohort, no external validation, no clinical covariates and a small number of late-stage test tumours. Expression of this gene panel carries limited but measurable information about anatomical stage; expression-based stage models should be combined with clinicopathological variables and validated in independent cohorts before any clinical application is considered.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning
Shikha Roy, Rakesh Kumar, … Dinesh Kumar Gupta·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2020
- Expression based biomarkers and models to classify early and late stage samples of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Sherry Bhalla, Harpreet Kaur, … Gajendra P. S. Raghava·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2020
- Gene co-expression is distance-dependent in breast cancer
Diana García-Cortés, Guillermo de Anda‐Jáuregui, … Jesús Espinal Enríquez·Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2020
- Lift the Veil of Breast Cancers Using Four or Fewer Critical Genes
Zhengjun Zhang·Cancer InformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- An integrative machine learning approach identifies the centrality of ferroptosis, cuproptosis, and immune pathway crosstalk for breast cancer stratification and therapy guidance.
Syed Ahsan Shahid, Ahmed Al-Harrasi, Adil Alsiyabi·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2025
- Attention-based GCN Integrates Multi-omics Data for Breast Cancer Subtype Classification and Patient-specific Gene Marker Identification
Hui Guo, Xiang Lv, … Menglong Li·Briefings in Functional GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2023