bioRxivEcology
Upscaling biodiversity monitoring: Metabarcoding estimates 31,846 insect species from Malaise traps across Germany
D. Buchner, J. Sinclair, M. Ayasse, A. J. Beermann, J. Buse, F. Dziock, J. Enss, M. Frenzel, T. P. B. Hoerren, Y. Li, M. T. Monaghan, C. Morkel, J. Mueller, S. U. Pauls, R. Richter, T. Scharnweber, M. Sorg, S. Stoll, S. Twietmeyer, W. Weisser, B. Wiggering, M. Wilmking, G. Zotz, M. O. Gessner, P. Haase, F. Leese
Abstract
Mitigating ongoing losses of insects and their key functions (e.g., pollination) requires accurately tracking large-scale and long-term community changes. However, doing so has been notoriously hindered by uniquely high insect species diversity that requires prohibitively high investments of time, funding, and taxonomic expertise. Here, we show that these concerns can be addressed through a comprehensive, scalable and cost-efficient DNA metabarcoding workflow. We use 1,815 samples from 75 Malaise traps across Germany from 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate how metabarcoding can be incorporated into large-scale insect monitoring networks for less than 50 {euro} per sample, including supplies, labor and maintenance. With on average 1.4M sequence reads per sample we uncovered 10,803 validated insect species, of which 83.9% were represented by a single OTU. We estimated another 21,403 plausible species, which likely either lack a reference barcode or are undescribed. The total of 31,846 species is similar to the number of insect species known for Germany ([~]35,500). Because Malaise traps capture only a subset of insects, our approach identified many species likely unknown from Germany or new to science. Our reproducible workflow ([~]80% OTU-similarity among years) provides a blueprint for large-scale biodiversity monitoring of insects and other biodiversity components in near real time.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Metabarcoding malaise trap plant components enables monitoring the diversity of plant-insect interactions
Stephanie J. Swenson, Lisa Eichler, … Birgit Gemeinholzer·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2021
- High-throughput biodiversity surveying sheds new light on the brightest of insect taxa
Ela Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht, Robert M. Goodsell, … Fredrik Ronquist·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Detecting flying insects using mega-nets and meta-barcoding
C. S. Svenningsen, T. G. Froslev, … A. P. Tottrup·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2020
- Charting the insect biodiversity of Crete: insights from a pilot metabarcoding survey
Georgios Koutsovoulos, Martin Sorg, … Alexandros Stamatakis·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2026
- Expedited Assessment of Terrestrial Arthropod Diversity by Coupling Malaise Traps with DNA Barcoding
J. R. deWaard, V. Levesque-Beaudin, … P. D. N. Hebert·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2017
- Establishing insect community composition using metabarcoding of soil samples, and preservative ethanol and homogenate from Malaise trap catches: surprising inconsistencies between methods.
D. Marquina, R. Esparza-Salas, … F. Ronquist·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2019